Answer:
$19,440
Explanation:
The computation of the direct material cost is shown below:
But before that first we have to determine the per unit which is given below
= Total direct material cost ÷ planned selling units
= $18,225 ÷ 4,050 units
= $4.5
And, the actually selling units is 4,320 units
So, the direct material cost is
= Per unit cost × actually selling units
= $4.5 × 4,320 units
= $19,440
We simply multiplied the per unit with the actually selling units so that the direct material cost could come
Social responsibility means an acceptable theory which is applies to everyone, expecting that the act of individual must benefit the whole of society.
Corporate Social Responsibility refers to practices and policies undertaken by firms and other business, who are intending to have a positive influence on the environment and world at large.
Triple bottom line is also a concept that state that in addition to the <em>major objectives</em> of firms which is to make profit, they should ensure they impact the society and environment as well.
The looting of shops and mall will take a toll on the moral effort of firms and businesses adhering to the triple bottom line concept as well as the corporate social responsibility as they have to count on the loss incurred, caused by the masses.
Despite that insurance provision and government can provide compensation for the looted goods, still, the morale of the firms authorities and business owners towards the social responsibility concept and triple bottom line concept will be negative
Learn more about this here <em>brainly.com/question/1341005</em>
Answer:
B. 17.78 days
Explanation:
Days Sales Outstanding or Age of Receivables measures the average number of days it take for a company to collect its receivables.
This is computed by dividing the Average Accounts Receivables over Daily Sales. Bear Rug's Average Accounts Receivable is $39,500 ($41,000 + $38,000/2) while its Daily Sales is 2,222 ($811,000/365).
Thus, the average days for the firm to collect its receivables are 17.78 days ($39,500/2,222).
Answer:
1. What must the shareholders prove to recover?
The shareholders say that the Board of Directors had given Ovitz more as written in Employment Agreement. Ovitz had more incentives & other facilities as compared to other employees.
And that is unfair with the other employees. Because of this the shareholders had filed a complaint against the company about the remuneration of O.
2. What does the court say is the relationship between good corporate governance, liability, and business judgment?
The court has to decide that whether the Board of directors should be responsible for the decision-making process and wasting corporate assets or they have power and authority to do anything they want.
Rules of corporate governance of any company are mentioned in their terms and conditions and in this case the Board goes beyond the requirements and because of this liability of company will also increase.
3. What alternatives to litigation do shareholders have?
They have many alternatives;
1) Negotiation with the Directors
2) Dealing with small claims electronically.
3) Through Discussion
4) Involvement of some mediator
