The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) declares that the Constitution, federal legislation adopted in accordance with it, and treaties signed in accordance with its authority are the "supreme Law of the Land" and supersede any conflicting state laws.
It stipulates that state constitutions are subordinate to the supreme law and that state courts must abide by it.
Thus, Option A is correct.
<h3>Why did the Supremacy Clause come into being?</h3>
The provision gave the Supreme Court the power to support the creation of a robust federal government. The U.S. Constitution's Supremacy Clause was added because the Articles of Confederation did not have one. According to the Articles, state laws could not and did not take precedence over federal legislation.
For more information about Supremacy Clause refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/13839329
#SPJ4
La respuesta correcta a esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
La pregunta está incompleta ya que no ofrece opciones, referencias o un contexto en particular.
Sin embargo, haciendo una investigación extensa, podemos decir que se refiere a la situación que se vive en los mercados públicos en Perú, donde las aglomeraciones son comunes en estos mercados públicos.
¿Cuál es el conflicto que se presenta en esta situación?
El conflicto que se presenta es que las personas no están respetando el distanciamiento social al que ha invitado el gobierno para minimizar los contagios en esta época de pandemia. Al existir esas aglomeraciones, la gente se expone al contagio y muchos locatarios de esos mercados se han contagiado.
¿Por qué ocurre?
Esto ocurre porque la gente tiene necesidad de trabajar para ganar un dinero. La mayoría de esas personas viven al día. Si no trabajan, no comen. de igual manera, mucha gente de escasos recursos tiene que comprar su comida todos los días porque no tienen refrigeradores o electricidad en su casas.
¿Qué solución podría darse?
El gobierno podría ser más sensible a esta situación y no mandar a la fuerza policíaca porque eso genera más desobediencia y confrontaciones. El gobierno podía establecer algunos programas sociales que ayuden a la gente pobre del Perú.
The action above is a type of informal deviance. It is because an informal deviance is being referred when someone is violating informal social norms. The norms that has been violated are not being encoded, in which the law is responsible in it. Picking your nose in public is one of the actions of having to violate the informal social norms in the society.
Party activists are most likely to contribute time to party affairs and less likely to hold more extreme views than the party âs rank-and-file voters.
<h3>Who is a
Party activists?</h3>
A Party activists serves as the person that works so as to be able to bring political or social changes through the campaign in the public o for an organization.
It should be noted that Party activists are most likely to contribute time to party affairs and less likely to hold more extreme views than the party âs rank-and-file voters.
Learn more about activists on:
brainly.com/question/784145
#SPJ1
Answer: Carl Rogers
Carl Rogers uses a person-centered approach in understanding personality and human relationships.
Carl Rogers was a humanistic psychologist who stated that for a person to "grow", they need an environment that provides them with genuineness, acceptance, and empathy.