1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rzqust [24]
3 years ago
11

PLZZ HELP!!! WILL GIVE BRAINLEST

English
2 answers:
ahrayia [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I GOT YOU

Explanation:

a. "which would totally be a good thing"

b. which would be excellent for those who priorotise democracy.

Lorico [155]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

“This would get a higher voter turnout, which would totally be a good thing” is the shift in style. You could rewrite it to say, “This would get a higher voter turnout.” You can also rewrite that sentence however you want as long as it doesn’t use totally, which makes it unprofessional.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How do I describe agriculture (please explain in your own words)
joja [24]

Answer:

Agriculture is the art and science of cultivating the soil, growing crops and raising livestock. It includes the preparation of plant and animal products for people to use and their distribution to markets. Agriculture provides most of the world's food and fabrics.

7 0
3 years ago
The red roosters squawked because all of the hens had been painted blue.
RideAnS [48]
Adverb clause: <em />because all of the hens had been painted blue.
Subordinate conjunction: because
Word modified: squawked 
5 0
4 years ago
Write about happiness and success in your opinion ​
dezoksy [38]

Answer:

According to Lyubomirsky, et al., (2005) numerous studies have shown that happy people tend to be successful across multiple domains in life, including work performance, health, income, friendship, and even marriage.

The authors have devised a conceptual model that accounts for these findings. They argue that the happiness-success link exists not only because success makes people happy, but also from the positive affect engendering success.

The study examined three classes of evidence, including:

Cross-sectional

Longitudinal

Experimental

The results of the findings revealed that happiness is associated with and precedes numerous successful outcomes. Moreover, it was also discovered that certain behaviors tended to parallel that success.

The evidence suggests that the idea of positive affect, the hallmark of well-being, may actually be the cause of many of the desirable characteristics, resources, and successes correlated with such happiness.

The real question then becomes, what comes first, happiness or success? This is akin to the chicken and egg scenario as well.

If happiness comes first, then you must surmise that you have to figure out how to be happy before your success will come rolling in.

On the other side of the coin is the idea of success coming first, before happiness.

What does it take to really be happy? Do you have to be successful in order to be happy? There are most likely millions of people in the world who would disagree with you on that point because success does not guarantee happiness.

There are just as many people out there who deem themselves happy, while not necessarily successful, as there are successful people still trying to figure out how to be happy.

How do these two constructs tie together? That is the issue we will discuss.

According to the fight or flight theory, humans were not wired for happiness, they were wired for survival.

Many of us find ourselves rushing through life, chasing happiness. The problem is that we never quite get there.

For many of us, happiness is something we aspire to. Happiness is somewhere we get to someday. What we fail to recognize is that happiness is a state of mind, not a destination.

We know happiness is not a static state, because even the happiest people feel blue sometimes.

Norrish and Vella-Brodrick (2008) studied whether happiness is even a worthwhile pursuit. Happiness, the pursuit of it, and what it means to live a good life has been long debated

4 0
3 years ago
What did the proclamation of 1763 do?
Georgia [21]
It was when King George the third wanted a stronger government in the colonies. So he made the proclamation of 1763. It had the land of the Appalachian Mountains to the Indians for their hunting grounds.
3 0
3 years ago
Webster, Worcester, and Bouvier all define a citizen to be a person in the United States, entitled to vote and hold office.
BabaBlast [244]

Answer: by mentioning the idea that women are not people

Explanation:

A citizen is a person in the United states and yet women were people in the United States but still could not vote. Susan Anthony is therefore asking if women were not people as well because only that would explain why they did not have the right to vote.

In saying this she connected with the emotions of women who in being made to feel like second-class citizens did not feel like they were people.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following statements is a fallacy of logos
    8·2 answers
  • What event coincided with the emergence of the Federalist and anti federalist political parties in the United States
    14·1 answer
  • Lisa notices an error in grammer in the first paragraph of the text
    9·2 answers
  • Why is it important to determine the central idea of a speech or essay?
    5·2 answers
  • How do I look???? Please don't judge me :(<br> EVERYBODY HAVE A GREAT DAY STAY SAFE!
    5·2 answers
  • LORD OF THE FLIES
    15·2 answers
  • Help!!!!!!!
    15·2 answers
  • How does Fahrenheit 451 relate to today?
    13·2 answers
  • Read the words and decide If are synonyms and antonyms
    8·1 answer
  • Write an essay on why we should always do our homework
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!