1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Katen [24]
3 years ago
15

What is the difference between jurisdiction and responsibility

Law
1 answer:
Flauer [41]3 years ago
6 0
Jurisdiction is the official power to make legal decisions and judgements and responsibility is The state of fact of being accountable for something yep they both sound similar they’re both different in the way that jurisdiction means that you have to make a legal decision that could determine a persons life.
You might be interested in
When there is flooding and you see pooled water, what
svp [43]
Answer D, due to the fact that driving through a pool of water at very high speeds can increase the chances of a fatal accident.
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Galen went to the supermarket to buy rice and soda while he was
lesya692 [45]

Answer:

On a call?

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How is a person's legal standing defined by law?
Shalnov [3]
<h3>In law, standing or locus standi is a condition that a party seeking a legal remedy must show they have by demonstrating to the court sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party's participation in the case.</h3>
3 0
3 years ago
Can i drive to school and work with my learners permit? florida
Yakvenalex [24]

Answer:

depending on how old you are you will need to go to the dmv and get a waiver

Explanation:

i just went through drivers ed my self, and i live in fl, and a few students also had this question, the dmv should be able to guide you better. but if you are younger tahn 18 i think youd need a waiver

5 0
3 years ago
The 5th Amendment had an impact on Miranda V. Arizona.<br> O True<br> O False
SashulF [63]

Answer:

true, i think

Explanation:

In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • David was accused of a serious crime, and thus, had to face trial. A US trial court declared David guilty by the end of the proc
    9·1 answer
  • After the initial walk-through, who is now in authority of the crime scene, securing the safety of both people and crime
    15·1 answer
  • Which of these is an example of business ownership?
    14·2 answers
  • Failure to file a tax return is an example of an _____<br> to act.
    9·1 answer
  • Please help I don’t know the answer to this.
    8·1 answer
  • Briefly describe what Marks says in the beginning of his talk about conflict and compromise.
    5·1 answer
  • Although the United States was founded on freedom, the original law stipulated that to be able to have a vote, a person must not
    8·1 answer
  • Under common law, it is assumed a contract reflects promises that will be enforced without specifying the details in the contrac
    9·1 answer
  • A mother was in a nursing home and asked her attorney to draft a deed that would give her farm to her son. The attorney drew up
    13·1 answer
  • This hearing resulted from a violation of an agreement made during a plea bargain two months prior. What point in the criminal j
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!