Im not good in math and this is my first question, my best guess is D
I will investigate tommorow this problem a little bit more... <3
Answer:
2 1/6
Step-by-step explanation:
9 1/2 - 7 1/3
to improper
19/2 - 22/3
= 2 1/6
Given rectangle RUTS, the missing reasons that justifies the five statements in the two-column proof are:
- Given
- Definition of rectangle.
- Definition of rectangle.
- By SAS Congruence Theorem.
- By CPCTC.
<h3>What is a Rectangle?</h3>
- A rectangle is a quadrilateral.
- All four angles in a rectangle are right angles.
- The opposite sides of a rectangle are parallel and congruent to each other.
Therefore, based on what we are given and the definition of a rectangle, we can establish that △URS ≅ △STU by SAS.
Since △URS ≅ △STU, therefore ∠USR = ∠SUT by CPCTC.
In conclusion, given rectangle RUTS, the missing reasons that justifies the five statements in the two-column proof are:
- Given
- Definition of rectangle.
- Definition of rectangle.
- By SAS Congruence Theorem.
- By CPCTC.
Learn more about properties of rectangle on:
brainly.com/question/2835318
Step-by-step explanation:
Simplifying
3(3w + -5) = 12
Reorder the terms:
3(-5 + 3w) = 12
(-5 * 3 + 3w * 3) = 12
(-15 + 9w) = 12
Solving
-15 + 9w = 12
Solving for variable 'w'.
Move all terms containing w to the left, all other terms to the right.
Add '15' to each side of the equation.
-15 + 15 + 9w = 12 + 15
Combine like terms: -15 + 15 = 0
0 + 9w = 12 + 15
9w = 12 + 15
Combine like terms: 12 + 15 = 27
9w = 27
Divide each side by '9'.
w = 3
Simplifying
w = 3
