According to O'Neill, the various versions of Kant's categorical imperative look extremely dissimilar. True False

Social Studies

1 answer:

tino4ka555 [31]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

The given statement is <u>true as it correctly states about O'Neill's discussion over the differences discovered in Kant's diverse types of 'Categorical Imperative</u>.' His formulations are quite varied from one another as he says that 'though there exists only one categorical imperative yet it has distinct formulations.' In the one, he displays the moral conduct "Act only on the principle...according...it should become a universal law." While in the other, he asserts "act as to treat humanity." Thus, there is difference among the two formulations and hence, the statement is true.

You might be interested in

After World War I, Georgia went through an<br> recession.

fredd [130]

Is this true or false? If so its true.

4 0

3 years ago

In schenck v. us (1919), the supreme court ruled that congress could ban certain types of speech in times of war if they constit

OLEGan [10]

In Schenck v. the United States (1919), the Supreme Court ruled that criticism of the draft was NOT protected by the First Amendment, because it created a clear and present danger to American interests.

In the Schenk v. US case, which concerns the freedom of speech issue, Schenk urged Americans to forgo the World War I draft.

The Supreme Court concluded in Schenck v. the United States that the First Amendment did not apply to criticism of the draft because it posed a clear and present danger to American interests.