All categories

3 years ago

To what extent might the slow service be a source of employee irritation and dissatisfaction

Business

1 answer:

harkovskaia [24]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Slow service can be an extension and source of employee irritation and dissatisfaction. In any business, you rely on employees to perform simultaneous tasks. It is a team effort. Good management usually incentives good work. As a result, when you have an employee or a cluster of employees that are not satisfied the service will more likely be poor. For example, a fast-food restaurant may have two employees that are dissatisfied with the manager. These employees will look for any distraction and will abuse breaks and so forth. The attention to detail will be minimized and items on the menu will be missing something. Finally, the business will suffer in the long run. Customers will complain and the food will have to be prioritized. Customers will leave if it is taking too long. As a team, when one or two slack off the entire team suffers. Think of a football game if two players decide to try and make all the points and fail in doing so. They have jeopardized the potential of winning or producing.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Longview Manufacturing Company manufactures two products (I and II). The overhead costs ($60,500) have been divided into three c

Mila [183]

Answer:

a. $8,000.

Explanation:

The computation of the amount of overhead cost assigned to the product I is shown below:

= $40,000 ÷ 2,500 × $500

= $8,000

Hence, the amount of overhead cost assigned to the product I is $8,000

Therefore the correct option is a.

7 0

3 years ago

A downfall of the infant-industry argument is that

denis23 [38]

A downfall of the infant-industry argument is that once established, a tariff is politically difficult to remove.
For new industries, it almost impossible for a new startup to compete against a well-established industry unless they have a unique differentiation in their product.

8 0

3 years ago

A city street is a. always a public good, whether or not it is congested. b. a public good when it is congested, but it is a com

anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

a common resource when it is congested, but it is a public good when it is not congested.

Explanation:

We live in different areas, across city streets, with roads and they can either be public goods or common resources. Now, when the streets are not congested, it simply means that an individual can freely access the areas without that affecting any other person. In this simple case, the use by one person is not in rival consumption and so the streets are said to be a public good. But when the area is fully congested, people might find it difficult to move around through the areas. The use of the areas could cause negative externalities. Because the place would be overcrowded, people can only move at a slow pace. In this case, the street are said to be a common resource.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Henry Ford once said, "If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." The invention of the car is

Shkiper50 [21]

Answer:

The invention of the car is an early example of disruptive technologies.

Explanation:

The technologies that successfully break a certain long-running trend to start another successfully can be termed as disruptive technologies.
The rate of acceptance of such technologies is initially the lowest but they thrive very soon to completely replace the existing methods in use.
Disruptive technologies are often more efficient than their older alternatives and that is why they are deemed as profitable.

5 0

3 years ago

Assume stock A costs $100 at t = 0 in a two-period world. There are two scenarios at t = 1: good and bad. In the good scenario t

Arada [10]

Answer:

The offer at $4.60 by the broker is higher than the calculated fair value of $4.545 hence i will not take up his offer

Explanation:

Given data:

stock A = $100 at t = 0

in two worlds : good scenario ; stock A = $120

bad scenario ; stock A = $70

probability = 0.5

annual risk less rate = 10% = 0.1

To determine if to take the offer or not we have to calculate the call option using the given parameters

Cu = $\frac{(0.5*10) + (0.5*0)}{(1 + 0.10)}$ = $4.545

The offer at $4.60 by the broker is higher than the calculated fair value of $4.545 hence i will not take up his offer

3 0

3 years ago