Sure. From those choices, the only one that makes sense is that he
didn't perform enough trials. Technically, you can't expect the experimental
probability to match the theoretical probability until you've rolled it an infinite
number of times.
I have a hunch that even for only 60 trials, such a great discrepancy between
theory and experiment is beginning to suggest that the cubie is loaded. But
you really can't say. You just have to keep trying and watch how the numbers
add up.
Step-by-step explanation:
7y +7x +5 = > answer
hope this will be helpful to you.
plz mark my answer as brainlist plzzzz
Given =
Two similar pyramid have base area of 12.2 cm² and 16 cm².
surface area of the larger pyramid = 56 cm²
find out the surface area of the smaller pyramid
To proof =
Let us assume that the surface area of the smaller pyramid be x.
as surface area of the larger pyramid is 56 cm²
Two similar pyramid have base area of 12.2 cm² and 16 cm².
by using ratio and proportion
we have
ratio of the base area of the pyramids : ratio of the surface area of the pyramids

x = 12.2 ×56×
by solvingthe above terms
we get
x =42.7cm²
Hence the surface area of the smaller pyramid be 42.7cm²
Hence proved
The answer is 3n because the 3 is the coefficient