1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yawa3891 [41]
4 years ago
14

Which choice describes the forms that energy takes when it starts in the Sun and ends in the sugars of plants?

Chemistry
2 answers:
Lapatulllka [165]4 years ago
8 0
It goes from radiant to chemical.
klasskru [66]4 years ago
6 0

nuclear energy  light energy  chemical potential energy

You might be interested in
What physical effect can change the boiling point of a substance?
AleksandrR [38]
The correct answer for the following questions that are presented above are these ones:
(1) b. Pressure. The <span>physical effect can change the boiling point of a substance is the pressure.
(2) </span><span>Evaporation only occurs at the surface of a liquid. TRUE.</span><span>
(3) </span>d. freezing. The change from liquid to solid, or the reverse of melting, is called freezing.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Reaction
Effectus [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

From the information given:

We can say that the rate of reaction is utilized to decide the reaction speed, and it is subject to the rate constant.

The power of concentration related to the rate equation can be said to be the order of the reaction.

For zero-order reaction: it is the reaction whose rate is free and not dependent on the reactant's concentration.  

Concentration-time reaction is given as;

\mathbf{[A] = [A_o] -kt ---- (1)}

where;

t = time

k = rate constant

A_o = initial concentration of reactant

Thus, the plot between [A] and t needs to be a straight line.

On the other hand, The First order reaction is the reaction whose rate is straightforwardly corresponding to the reactant's concentration.  

Its concentration-time relation can be expressed as,

\mathbf{In([A])= In ([A_o])-kt   ---- (2)}

t = time

k = rate constant

[A_o] = initial concentration of the reactant

Then, the plot between [A] & t requires to be a straight line.

Presently, the plot between ln([A]) vs time appears to be in a straight line with the slope of the line equivalents to the rate constant (k).

hence,

slope = -k

Then;

\mathbf{k = -slope  ---- (3)}

Now; to discover the activation energy we need to utilize Arrhenius relation which is given as,

\mathbf{In(k) = In(K_o) - \dfrac{E_o}{RT}  ---- (4)}

From the above equation;

k_o = arrhenius parameter

Ea = activation energy

R = 8.314 J/mol.K

T = temperature in Kelvin

From the data given  for concentration vs time;

t[min]      Ca(mol/L)

0                      2

5                     1.6

9                     1.35

15                   1.1

22                    0.87

30                    0.7

40                    0.53

60                    0.35

a)

Since we can deduce the order of the reaction,

Let's assume that it is a zero-order reaction, Thus, the plot of Ca vs t can be seen in the first image attached below;

From the diagram, it is clear and obvious that it is NOT a straight line.

Thus, we conclude that this order is NOT a zero-order.

However, let also assume that order is first order,

Now, from the second diagram showing the plot of ln(Ca) vs t, we can deduce that it is a straight line which implies that it is the order of the reaction is first order.

Therefore, the equation for the first order is given as;

\mathbf{In([A]) = In ([A_o])- kt}

Recall that: the slope of the ln(A) v/s time will result in a rate constant,

Thus, from the graph we have;

slope = -0.0289 mol/L.min and:

slope = - k

Hence;

rate constant = k = 0.0289 mol/L.min and the order = 1st order

b)

On the off chance that we need to take more data points, we will like to take the data point in the scope of 40 min to 60 min time interval, on the grounds that the significant deviation is seen there. more information focuses will imply more accuracy.

8 0
3 years ago
Which describes Ernest Rutherford’s experiment?
soldi70 [24.7K]
The best description of Ernest Rutherford's experiment is letter C. The positively charged particles were fired through a gold foil. 
3 0
4 years ago
The theoretical yield of zinc oxide in a reaction is 486 g. What is the percent
PtichkaEL [24]

Answer:

the correct answer is c

Explanation:

becuase i had the same question

8 0
3 years ago
a) Calculatethe molality, m, of an aqueous solution of 1.22 M sucrose, C12H22O11. The density of the solution is 1.12 g/mL.b) Wh
Contact [7]

Answer:

a) 1,74 molal

b) 37,2 %

c) 0,03

Explanation:

We are going to define sucrose as solute, water as solvent and the mix of both, the solution.

Let´s start with the data:

Molarity = M = \frac{1,22 mol solute}{lts solution}

We can assume as a calculus base, 1 liter of solution. So, in 1 liter of solution we have 1,22 moles of solute:

1 lts solution * \frac{1,22 moles solute}{lts solution}=1,22 moles solute

Knowing that the molality (m) is defined as mol of solute/kgs solvent, we have to calculate the mass of solvent on the solution. Remember our calculus base (1 lts of solution). In 1 lts of solution we have 1120 grams of solution.

1 lts solution * \frac{1,12 grs solution}{mL solution}*\frac{1000 mL solution}{1 lts solution} = 1120 grs of solution

With the molecular weight of solute (<em>Sum of: for carbon = 12*12=144; for hydrogen = 1*22=22 and for oxygen = 16*11=176. Final result = 342 grs per mol</em>), we can obtain the mass of solute:

1,22 mol solute*\frac{342 grs solute}{1 mol solute} = 417,24 grs solute

Now, the mass of solvent is: mass solvent = mass of solution - mass of solute. So, we have: 1120 - 417,24 = 702,76 grs of solvent = 0,70276 Kgs of solvent

molality = m = \frac{1,22 mol solute}{0,70276 kgs solvent}= 1,74 molal

For b) question we have that the mass percent of solute is hte ratio between the mass of solute and the mass of solution. So,

%(w/w) = \frac{417,24 grs solute}{1120 grs solution} = 37,2%

For c) question we have that the mole fraction of solute is the ratio between moles of solute and moles of solution. Let's calculate the moles of solution as follows: <em>Moles solution = moles solute + moles solvent.</em> First we have that the moles of solvent are (remember that the molecular weight of water for this calculus is 18 grs per mol):

702,76 grs solvent*\frac{1 mol solvent}{18 grs solvent} = 39,04 moles solvent  

So, we have the moles of solution: 1,22 moles of solute + 39,04 moles of solvent = 40,26 moles of solution

Finally, we have:

Mol frac solute = \frac{1,22 mol solute}{40,26 mol solution}= 0,03

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is NaH2????????
    14·1 answer
  • 3. Prolonged exposure to lead or lead salts is toxic. To prevent lead poisoning, the current standard for lead paint is 600.0 pp
    14·1 answer
  • Which situation is the best analogy for the doppler effect?
    5·2 answers
  • BRAINLIEST ASAP! I NEED HELP PLEASE..
    10·1 answer
  • Why is petrified wood considered a fossil?
    5·1 answer
  • What substance do you get when you combine Bromine and Barium?
    9·1 answer
  • .What is the effective number of bonds between the sulfur atom and each oxygen atom in the sulfate ion
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not considered a base unit according to the SI units of measurement
    9·1 answer
  • What geological process(es) could form magnesium silicate perovskite at 500 C?
    12·1 answer
  • How many moles are in 225 grams is NaCl
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!