Answer:
The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 21% of the time.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is the right answer,since this result is only observed 21% of the time, so in general it's not significant, so the first 2 are eliminated. The 2 x 0.21 doesn't matter since, the percent is 21% not 42%, so it doesn't even matter. The last question we eliminate is:"The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 79% of the time" 79% of the time is a pretty good amount to say it's significant, but it only says 21% of the time.So, it leaves us with:The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 21% of the time.
Hope this helps lol (: is this a psat or somethin?
Answer:
Divide each term by 5, looking at the coefficients. The answer is x - 7y + 10
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: a. 1734 b. 477000
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that,
Distributive property : a(b+c) = ab+ac
a. 17 x 102
= 17 (100+2)
= 17 x 100 + 17 x 2 [Distributive property ]
= 1700+34
= 1734
b. 477×1035 -477×35
= 477 (1035-35) [Distributive property ]
= 477 (1000)
= 477000
That would make a rectangular prism with measurements of:
Length = 9
Width = 4
Height = 10
V = lwh
V = 9 * 4 * 10
V = 360
Answer:
39
Step-by-step explanation:
65/5=13
13x3=39