The answer is not C it is actually D. from P1 to P2 the demand curve is shifting outwards, therefore creating an increase in demand
Answer:
$5.59
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the value of the entity multiple of Company X in Year 1
Using this formula
Entity multiple=Market value / EBITDA
Let plug in the formula
Entity multiple=$99,450/$17800
Entity multiple=$5.59
Therefore the value of the entity multiple of Company X in Year 1 will be $5.59
<span>Lost profits are consequential damages. Haddad is right that a buyer may not recover consequential damages that it could have prevented by cover. But Jewell-Rung offered legitimate reasons for not covering: the only Lakeland garments now available to it were those made by Olympic. Olympic would not sell a competitor the garments at reasonable prices. Further, Jewell-Rung could not rely on the quality of the garments manufactured by a different company. Jewell-Rung's failure to cover was reasonable and the company was entitled to prove its lost profits. Jewell-Rung Agency, Inc. v. Haddad Organization, Ltd</span>
Answer:
INCREMENTAL cost allocation method
Explanation:
Incremental cost allocation method is the ranking of individual users of the cost object in such a way that the order of users most responsible for the common cost and then uses its ranking to allocate cost among those users. So they'd be ranked from primary user to first incremental user to second incremental user and so on until the cost have been assigned to all users. It requires one user to be seen as the primary user/party and other users to be seen as incremental user/party.
