1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MA_775_DIABLO [31]
3 years ago
5

Since race and ethnicity are entirely social constructs, why do you think society is so heavily divided based on race and ethnic

ity?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Mandarinka [93]3 years ago
5 0

Answer and Explanation:

Note: This is a personal question, which means you should provide your personal opinion. Therefore, feel free to change anything in the answer or simply use it as a model for your own.

Since race and ethnicity are entirely social constructs, why do you think society is so heavily divided based on race and ethnicity?

I believe it boils to down to the basic human need concerning the sense of belonging. Human beings realized the need to live in communities thousands of years ago because that made it safer and easier to survive. We also learned to distinguish between our own communities and others, looking for differences. Thus, is someone looked strange, talked in a different language, dressed differently, etc., we knew it meant he or she did not belong to our community, and that made us aware of the possibility of his or her being an enemy.

Somehow, we do not seem to have overcome that behavior yet. We still look for differences and base our judgments on them. If someone's skin color is different than our own, some people will still identify that person as belonging to a different community. Unfortunately, that judgment is often accompanied by prejudices, a fact that also seems attached to our need to belong to a community. We are taught to believe our community and its members are better, more intelligent, more civilized.

You might be interested in
Although leaders and citizens have worked for years to build peace between Israel and its neighbors, the process continues today
antoniya [11.8K]
Sometime in the mid-1970s the term peace process became widely used to describe the American-led efforts to bring about a negotiated peace between Israel and its neighbors. The phrase stuck, and ever since it has been synonymous with the gradual, step-by-step approach to resolving one of the world's most difficult conflicts. In the years since 1967<span> the emphasis in Washington has shifted from the spelling out of the ingredients of "peace" to the "process" of getting there. … Much of US constitutional theory focuses on how issues should be resolved – the process – rather than on substance – what should be done. … The United States has provided both a sense of direction and a mechanism. That, at its best, is what the peace process has been about. At worst, it has been little more than a slogan used to mask the marking of time.</span><span>[2]</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did feudalism replace
Nitella [24]
Feudalism was essentially a monarchy. It had social classes. It replaced the old courts of a land with ones controlled by the king.
6 0
3 years ago
What large body of water (a bay) borders Delaware on the north east
natali 33 [55]
Delaware is bordered on the north-east by a Delaware Bay. I think that's the one you meant because it's large indeed - it has about 782 square miles :)
5 0
3 years ago
How many permanent countries with a veto are there on the united nations security council?
tino4ka555 [31]

Answer:The United Nations Security Council "veto power" refers to the power of the five permanent members which are China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What Would life be like in our country today if your founding fathers only slightly patched and amended the articles of confeder
Black_prince [1.1K]

<u>Answer:</u>

<em>Life would be totally different if the Confederate articles were amended. There would be no central government.</em> The articles of confederation were first adopted in 1777.

It went into full effect in 1781 however, it didn’t last long. The Confederation articles were finally restored by the <em>Constitution of the United States on the 4th of March, 1789. </em>

Every state would have their own militias. Each state would be independent and could not be delegated to Congress.

They could not regulate taxes or commerce. <em>These were a few of the reasons the articles of confederation could not last long</em>.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A patient says, "i have the same continuous and intrusive thoughts that my house is contaminated with lethal bacteria. i spend h
    13·1 answer
  • To psychoanalytic therapists, the story line of a dream, or its surface content, is known as its _______________ content.
    10·1 answer
  • What sort of action is considered treason? What proof is needed to convict?
    7·1 answer
  • Joanna is conducting a research project that examines whether parent's income impacts a child's choice of college. joanna thinks
    6·1 answer
  • Before he can study, Rashid must arrange his books, pencils, paper, and other items on his desk in a particular way. The campus
    12·2 answers
  • Decide whether or not the following goals are SMART. Give
    14·1 answer
  • 3. Conclude the impact the Germanic barbarians such as the Vandals, Angles, Saxons, Huns, and Visigoths had on the fall of Rome.
    8·1 answer
  • What was at bastille at the time of the attacks
    14·2 answers
  • American colonists who fought against Great Britain are called ____________________.
    8·1 answer
  • Treaties during and after the war
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!