Answer:
no to both questions, they might numb your gums but im not 100% sure.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
243 in^3
Step-by-step explanation:
Cut into 2 rectangles
First one would be ..
12 x 8 = 96
second one would be
7 x 21 = 147
Add them together
147 + 96 = 243
Answer:
0.89h or 53 minutes
Step-by-step explanation:
2m/h / 2.25m
= 0.89h
Answer: There is not a good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old because the prediction given by the trend line produced by the regression calculator probably is not valid that far in the future.
Step-by-step explanation:
Years since tree was planted (x) - - - - height (y)
2 - - - - 17
3 - - - - 25
5 - - - 42
6 - - - - 47
7 - - - 54
9 - - - 69
Using a regression calculator :
The height of tree can be modeled by the equation : ŷ = 7.36X + 3.08
With y being the predicted variable; 7.36 being the slope and 3.08 as the intercept.
X is the independent variable which is used in calculating the value of y.
Predicted height when years since tree was planted(x) = 100
ŷ = 7.36X + 3.08
ŷ = 7.36(100) + 3.08
y = 736 + 3.08
y = 739.08
Forward prediction of 100 years produced by the trendline would probably give an invalid value because the trendline only models a range of 9 years prediction. However, a linear regression equation isn't the best for making prediction that far in into the future.
