The equation according to the given verbal sentence is 
(after solving this 
).
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
Rewrite the given verbal sentence and so it will be easier to translate.
Given: The quotient of the sum of 2 t and 2 and twice the cube of s
sum of 2 t and 2 can be written as
2 t + 2
twice the cube of s
Now, combine the above according to the given verbal. The quotient of the sum of 2 t and 2 and twice the cube of s means,
2 t + 2 divided by
Now, the equation would be
When solving this equation, we get
Answer:
1.) 7. (7 x 7 = 9)
2.) IDK, sorry
3.) 8/27
Apply the product rule to 2/3
2^3/ 3^3
Raise 2 to the power of 3.
8/27
4.) 9
1. Exponentiation: 3 ^ 4 = 81
2. Exponentiation: 3 ^ (-2) = 0.111111111111 = 1/9
3. Multiple: the result of step No. 1 * the result of step No. 3 = 81*1/9 = 81 · 1/1 · 9 = 81/9 = 9 · 9/1 · 9 = 9
Multiply both numerators and denominators. Result fraction keep to lowest possible denominator GCD(81, 9) = 9. Cancelling by a common factor of 9 gives 9/1.
In words - eighty-one multiplied by one ninth = nine.
4. Exponentiation: 3 ^ 0 = 1
5.Multiple: the result of step No. 4 * the result of step No. 5 = 9 * 1 = 9
5.) 1/125
5 ^ (-3) = 0.008 = 1/125
6.) IDK, sorry
9514 1404 393
Answer:
- both are linear functions with a y-intercept of 3 and domain of all real numbers
- f(x) has positive slope, so a range of all real numbers
- g(x) has zero slope, so a range of only the value 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Both functions are shown in the attached graph. Both are linear functions with a y-intercept of 3. Both have a domain of all real numbers.
Function A has a positive slope, so has a range of all real numbers.
Function B has a zero slope, so its range is the single number y = 3.
Answer: The difference is as follows:
Step-by-step explanation:
- Deductive Arguments: A deductive argument is an argument wherein it is felt that the premises give an assurance of reality of the end. In a deductive arguments, the premises are planned to offer help for the conclusion that is so strong to an extent that, if the premises are valid, it would be impossible for the conclusion to be false.
- Inductive Arguments: An inductive arguments is an arguments where it is believed that the premises provide reasons supporting the likely truth of the conclusion. In an inductive arguments, the premises are proposed distinctly to be strong to an extent that, on the off chance that they are valid, at that point it is impossible that the conclusion is false.
The contrast between the two originates from the kind of connection the author or explainer of the argument takes there to be between the premises and the conclusion. In the event that the author of the argument accepts that reality of the premises certainly sets up reality of the conclusion because of definition, l<igical entailment or scientific need, at that point the argument is deductive. In the event that the author of the argument does not feel that reality of the premises certainly sets up reality of the conclusion, however in any case accepts that their fact gives valid justification to accept the conclusion genuine, at that point the argument is inductive.
Answer:
A.
Step-by-step explanation:
each one is $1.03
so if you want 2 stamps they would be $2.06
