All categories

3 years ago

Will the sun explode in future?

Physics

1 answer:

anzhelika [568]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The Sun won't explode. ... Eventually (in five or seven billion years time), the Sun's life will come to an end. Our star will swell up, becoming something called a “Red Giant” star. It might even get so big that it swallows the Earth whole.

You might be interested in

Three identical charges q form an equilateral triangle of side a with two charges on the x-axis and one on the positive y-axis.

shusha [124]

Answer:

$F_n = k*q*(\frac{2*(y + \frac{\sqrt{3}*a }{2}) }{((y+ \frac{\sqrt{3}*a }{2})^2 + (a/2)^2)^1.5 } +\frac{1}{y^2} )$

Explanation:

Given:

- Three identical charges q.

- Two charges on x - axis separated by distance a about origin

- One on y-axis

- All three charges are vertices

Find:

- Find an expression for the electric field at points on the y-axis above the uppermost charge.

- Show that the working reduces to point charge when y >> a.

Solution

- Take a variable distance y above the top most charge.

- Then compute the distance from charges on the axis to the variable distance y:

$r = \sqrt{(\frac{\sqrt{3}*a }{2} + y)^2 + (a/2)^2 }$

- Then compute the angle that Force makes with the y axis:

cos(Q) = sqrt(3)*a / 2*r

- The net force due to two charges on x-axis, the vertical components from these two charges are same and directed above:

F_1,2 = 2*F_x*cos(Q)

- The total net force would be:

F_net = F_1,2 + kq / y^2

- Hence,

$F_n = k*q*(\frac{2*(y + \frac{\sqrt{3}*a }{2}) }{((y+ \frac{\sqrt{3}*a }{2})^2 + (a/2)^2)^1.5 } +\frac{1}{y^2} )$

- Now for the limit y >>a:

$F_n = k*q*(\frac{2*y(1 + \frac{\sqrt{3}*a }{2*y}) }{y^3((1+ \frac{\sqrt{3}*a }{2*y})^2 + (a/y*2)^2)^1.5 }) +\frac{1}{y^2} )$

- Insert limit i.e a/y = 0

$F_n = k*q*(\frac{2}{y^2} +\frac{1}{y^2}) \\\\F_n = 3*k*q/y^2$

Hence the Electric Field is off a point charge of magnitude 3q.

8 0

3 years ago

Do you think seismographs predict earthquakes or measure earthquakes, explain your answer?

Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

No. Neither the USGS nor any other scientists have ever predicted a major earthquake. We do not know how, and we do not expect to know how any time in the foreseeable future.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What game most represents a wave

Julli [10]

Answer:

tipping over dominoes

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

On Earth, plasma exists in the ionosphere, in flames, and in chemical and nuclearexplosions. Matter in a controlled thermonuclea

nasty-shy [4]

The cost of developing thermonuclear power with plasmabe defended because D. It can provide an inexpensive power source.

<h3>How did the cost of developing thermonuclear power defended?</h3>

The cost of developing thermonuclear power defended becvause we can see in the paragraph how it was told that the generation of ths power can be donee through the understanding of the occurrence of plasmain nature,

It should be noted that this thermonuclear power with plasmabe posses the characteristics which make it to exist in the ionosphere, and it can be felt in the flames as well; as in the chemical and nuclearexplosions.

In conclusion the power can be seen as an inexpensive source power because the p[roduction of this power cn be found in most of the thing that can be found around us as discused above.

Therefore, option D is correct.

Will the sun explode in future?​

Will the sun explode in future?