The judge to be probable shown is not a method
Answer:
AAS is an acronym for Angle-Angle-Side. It basically means that if two angles and a nonincluded side of one triangle are congruent to two angles and the corresponding nonincluded side of a second triangle, then the two triangles are congruent. SAS is an acronym for Side-Angle-Side. It means that if two sides and the included angle of one triangle are congruent to two sides and the included angle of a second triangle, then the two triangles are congruent. SSS is an acronym for Side-Side-Side. It means that if three sides of one triangle are congruent to three sides of a second triangle, then the two triangles are congruent. ASA is an acronym for Angle-Side-Angle. It means that if two angles and the included side of one triangle are congruent to two angles and the included side of a second triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.
In the problem, we know that the corresponding sides of both triangles are congruent to each other, so those would be given. The third side of each triangle would also be congruent because of reflexive property. Reflexive property means that the two triangles share a line segment. So, the answer would be SSS.
In order for two linear lines to be perpendicular, the product of their gradient must be -1.
Let's take y = x + b and y = -x + b
This is already in the form: y = mx + b, where m is 1 and -1 respectively.
Since the product of their gradient is -1, they are said to be perpendicular.
Answer:
B the range, the x- and y-intercept
Step-by-step explanation:
the domain stays the same : all values of x are possible out of the interval (-infinity, +infinity).
but the range changes, as for the original function y could only have positive values - even for negative x.
the new function has a first term (with b) that can get very small for negative x, and then a subtraction of 2 makes the result negative.
the y-intercept (x=0) of the original function is simply y=1, as b⁰=1.
the y-intercept of the new function is definitely different, because the first term 3×(b¹) is larger than 3, because b is larger than 1. and a subtraction of 2 leads to a result larger than 1, which is different to 1.
the original function has no x-intercept (y=0), as this would happen only for x = -infinity. and that is not a valid value.
the new function has an x-intercept, because the y-values (range) go from negative to positive numbers. any continuous function like this must therefore have an x-intercept (again, y = the function result = 0)
Answer:
y = 11x - 18
Step-by-step explanation:
Use the equation y = mx + b
m (the slope) = 11
x (the x-coordinate) = 2
y (the y-coordinate) = 4
Plug it in for our original equation:
4 = 11*2 + b
4 = 22 + b
4 - 22 = b
b = -18
Therefore, the answer is y = 11x - 18. The tricks to these problems are usually in the same format, when you are given the slope and a point it passes through, just plug in the slope and the x and y, and solve for b. Hope this helps!