If the results of a experiment do not support the hypothesis this does not necessarily mean that the experiment was a failure or that the hypothesis was wrong, but simply that the test that was conducted did not find results that were significant and also showed that the "null hypothesis" was incorrect. Therefore, if a hypothesis is shown to be inaccurate by a particular experiment the issue might need further experimentation because it could be wrong or it could not, but this does not mean the experiment was a failure. In fact proving a hypothesis can be informative for conducting further experiments to conclude what caused the phenomena if not the original hypothesis.
Answer:
Lesley will have to pay a higher interest rate.
Explanation:
just did this on edge
Fish and it was a new land. About 20000 people then to migrate there
He came to Galveston, Texas, in 1820 and lived at Nacogdoches for the rest of his life.
Your college roommate labels each of their binders and notebooks, color codes their planner, and has several to-do lists for different aspects of life. your roommate is exhibiting strong Star
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is exhibiting a strong
Star?</h3>
Generally, The acronym STAR is an abbreviation for "situation," "task," "action," and "result."
Each of the concepts that make up the acronym STAR represents a separate stage that applicants might take in order to react to interview questions.
In conclusion, Candidates are able to deliver a complete response if they follow all four phases in the process.
The circumstance, task, action, and outcome format is a method that interviewers use to collect all of the pertinent information about a certain capacity that is required for the job.
Read more about exhibiting STAR
brainly.com/question/24493066
#SPJ1
