1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
QveST [7]
2 years ago
7

It is said that in a perfectly competitive market, raising the price of a firm's product from the prevailing market price of $17

9.00 to $199.00, ____________________. will likely cause the firm to reach its shutdown point immediately will cause the firm to recover some of its opportunity costs could likely result in a notable loss of sales to competitors is a sure sign the firm is raising the given price in the market
Business
1 answer:
stich3 [128]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

could likely result in a notable loss of sales to competitors

Explanation:

In the case of the perfect competitive market wheen the price of the firm is increased from $179 to $199 as compared to the prevailing market price so this means that there should be the loss with respect to the sales for the competitors or rivalrs as this would result the firm to lose its overall shares to its rivalry

Therefore the above statement should be considered true

You might be interested in
Steve went to his favorite hamburger restaurant with $3, expecting to buy a $2 hamburger and a $1 soda. when he arrived he disco
inysia [295]
The answer is The income effect. 
Income effect is described as the change in demand of a service or good brought on by change in the income of a consumer.It is observed in two cases first is when income of person increases and second is when price of goods or service decreases. 
The scenario given in the question is an example of second case as the price of burger was less than normal Steve perceived his income to be able to buy more product in same price
8 0
3 years ago
Is heronation valid will i make money from them
mars1129 [50]
I would definitely be weary. If you can't answer if they're valid on your own, it's probably not!
5 0
3 years ago
What were joint-stock companies and monopoly companies, and how did they contribute to increased trade and exploration?
Irina-Kira [14]

Answer:

Nowadays, a joint stock company is simply a corporation whose stockholders can buy or sell the company's stocks. But 4 centuries ago, joint stock companies were very different.

Joint stock companies were used by the British Empire to set colonies around the world, e.g. the Virginia Company was chartered rights to establish and exploit colonies in British territories, which are now the US.

A joint stock company was named that way because stocks of the company were sold to rich people in England that were willing to risk money in the colonies. E.g. Jameston was founded and basically owned by the Virginia Company. Joint stock companies were vital for the colonization processes of the British Empire.

The King of England could also establish chartered companies which basically had a monopoly over the trade of certain areas, e.g. the East India Company was probably one of the most famous of them and the most powerful and wealthy.

Some chartered companies were even responsible for paying the salaries and expenses of the British government officials in foreign countries. The East India Company basically ruled over all India and had its own private army.

5 0
3 years ago
Strum Services provides content management services to major educational publishers. Due to low morale, the level of employee ou
artcher [175]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "A": The company is on a tight deadline to complete a major project for an important client.

Explanation:

Coercion is the act by which a party forces to act another against its will because of a threat or an adverse situation. In the case given, as employees are underperforming, executives might find and excuse in an upcoming deadline of a major project for an important client to urge employees to hurry up in their jobs, otherwise the goal will not be met.

8 0
3 years ago
The law of demand states that as price increases, quantity demanded decreases. However, the amount that quantity demanded change
Mrrafil [7]

Answer:

The law of demand states that quantity purchased varies inversely with price. In other words, the higher the price, the lower the quantity demanded. This occurs because of diminishing marginal utility

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • If the exchange rate is 8 moroccan dirhams per u.s. dollars, a crate of oranges costs 400 dirhams in the moroccan capital of rab
    10·1 answer
  • If I currently sell 10,000 units, and my use of Formula 1 indicates that I will need to sell 500 additional units to justify my
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about applying organizational socialization research is true? Multiple Choice Organizations ca
    11·1 answer
  • Suppose pizzas and burgers are substitutes. If the price of pizza increases, what happens in each market?
    12·1 answer
  • A Goldsmith could hold some gold in reserve for depositors’ withdrawals, but ________________ excess gold and thereby make a pro
    9·1 answer
  • On May 31, 20X1, the Arlene Corporation adopted a plan to sell its cosmetics line of business, considered a component of the ent
    10·1 answer
  • List the characteristics typical of a c corporation
    13·1 answer
  • David works in a small manufacturing firm that makes customized office furniture. He feels it is important to work directly with
    11·1 answer
  • Sprinkle Inc. has outstanding 10,000 shares of $10 par value common stock. On July 1, 2020, Sprinkle reacquired 200 shares at $9
    5·1 answer
  • What would best explain why the equilibrium price of pink salmon decreased and the equilibrium quantity increased?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!