Answer: the correct answer is (B) win, as the weight requirement is discriminatory and doesn't appear necessary for the requirement of lifting 100 pounds.
Explanation:
The key issue here is that 100 pound is not much weight and also there are a number of states and localities that have passed laws against discrimitation on weight or height.
Answer:Weak,Inductive,Uncogent
Explanation:This tries to compare Sierra Nevada mountain range and the island of Jamaica are both popular tourist destinations.
The conclusion made by this statement is WEAK, INDUCTIVE AND UNCOGENT.
The information about the bringing of Ski equipment when traveling to Jamaica in February is not a strong, deductive and cogent conclusion as both areas are not exactly the same as stated by the write up.
A conclusion is said to be weak when it does not have strong evidence to back it up,it is said to be inductive if it is not fully supported by the premise and it is said to be Uncogent when the argument is not clear and believable.
Answer:
Ruling out
Explanation:
I'm not really sure myself but ruling out answers one by one has made me come up with an answer. It's not C, because the Dalai Llama (The leader of Buddism) and Siddartha Gautama (the Founder of Buddhism) are both male. I believe that it isnt A. because the Dalai Llama always inhabited tibet which is in China, not India. I believe that it's B. because Chinese culture is very family orientated and Siddartha Gautama left his family behind to study and found Buddhism and become enlightened. So in short answer is probably, B
Answer:
Out group discrimination or in group favouritism is likely to occur because a student at rivalry university or at their university was in the game.