Answer:
This test uses formaldehyde and sulfuric acid. The solution will turn purple when introduced to heroin, morphine, or other opium drugs.
Explanation:
Answer: purpose : is to have electoral strength sufficient to permit it to win control of a government usually with comparative regularity and when defeated to constitute the principal opposition to the party in power.
Example : Democratic Party.
Republican Party.
Explanation:
Based on the given information Deliah's a correct and most favorable filing status for the tax year 2021 is Married filing jointly. Thus the correct option is B.
<h3>What is Tax?</h3>
A tax is referred to a certain amount that is collected by the government of any country from its citizens which is later on used in the development process of the country including building hospitals, roads and maintaining transportation, and so on.
It is revealed in the case study that Delilah was a married woman with two dependent children at the time of her husband's passing in August 2021. She has never wed. The most advantageous file status for Deliah for the upcoming tax year 2021 is Married filing jointly.
Therefore, option B is appropriate.
Learn more about tax, here:
brainly.com/question/16423331
#SPJ1
The complete question is Probably
Deliah was married with two dependent children when her husband died in August 2020. She has not remarried. Deliah's correct and most favorable filing status for Tax Year 2020 is:
Single.
Married filing jointly.
Head of household.
Qualifying widow(er).
Answer:
"Opponents of the War Powers Resolution have traditionally claimed that clause 11 confers upon Congress only a narrow piece of war power. Defenders of the Resolution have argued in contrast that the Resolution constitutes an exercise of congressional authority under the clause. This last contention pokes at the truth without quite striking it. The War Powers Resolution is not constitutional as an exercise of the war power. It is constitutional because it defines the war power. The War Powers Resolution is nothing more or less than a congressional definition of the word "war" in article I. A definition of this kind coupled with a reasonable enforcement mechanism is well within the power of Congress under a proper understanding of the constitutional system of checks and balances. The definition does not intrude on any presidential prerogative. The mechanisms chosen by Congress to enforce the provisions of the Resolution were reasonable in 1973 and, although matters have been complicated by the United States Supreme Court's decision late last Term in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, those mechanisms remain reasonable today."
Explanation:
