Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
I linked a drawing below
Rectangle ABCD-Purple
Rectangle A'B'C'D'- Turquoise/Blue
Rectangle A''B''C''D''- Maroon/Red
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>#6</h3>
<u>Given equation:</u>
- 4/(x - 3) + 2/(x - 2) = 2
<u>Multiply all terms by (x - 3)(x - 2):</u>
- 4(x - 2) + 2(x - 3) = 2(x - 3)(x - 2)
- 2(x - 2) + (x - 3) = (x - 3)(x - 2)
- 2x - 4 + x - 3 = x² - 5x + 6
- x² - 5x - 3x + 6 + 7 = 0
- x² - 8x + 13 = 0
- x = (8 ± √(8² - 4*13))/2 = (8 ± √12)/2 = (8 ± 2√3)/2 = 4 ± √3
<u>Compare this to the given form to get:</u>
Correct choice is A
Answer:
Becky completed the proof incorrectly.
Step-by-step explanation:
The only difference of the two proofs, at least what I can see, is the reason for step 2. Angie claims that it is the Definition of Supplementary Angles, while Becky claims Angle Addition Postulate.
The Definition of Supplementary Angles states that m∠A + m∠B = 180°.
While the Angle Addition Postulate states that m∠A + m∠B = m∠C.
Because the context used is that m∠AKG + m∠GKB = 180° and m∠GKB + m∠HKB = 180°, it would be using the Definition of Supplementary Angles.
So Becky is the one who is incorrect.
Multiply the number by itself zero times , it's the only number which can be multiplied by any other number without changing that other number.
