Even though all of the above reasons may be critical pull factors, we could safely lean towards option B, <em>higher wages</em>, as the most indicative answer. Mexicans did not necessarily get better jobs than they had back in their native country, where they may even have been skilled and educated professionals; in fact, wages may have been significantly higher in comparison to their earnings at home, allowing them for having a better quality of life and affording medical care, which tends to be expensive in the USA. Education is not necessarily free -especially at its highest levels, which would help migrants and their offspring to still further improve their quality of life- but then again, higher wages could open the possibility of accessing some private higher education.
Answer:
yes it would be nice and great
Explanation:
this is because it is done in a plain idea of it
Fighting major sea battles between 1861 and 1862, creating a blockade of confederate ports, taking control of the Mississippi river.
<u>The Roman Republic:</u>
The Roman Republic was the time of old style roman human advancement starting with the oust of the Roman Kingdom, customarily dated to 509 BC, and finishing in 27 BC with the foundation of the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire started
- Augustus Caesar (r. 27 BCE-14 CE) turned into the primary sovereign of Rome and finished, in the west,
- The last Roman ruler, Romulus Augustulus (r. 475-476 CE), was removed by the Germanic King Odoacer (r. 476-493 CE).
- In the east, it proceeded as the Byzantine Empire until the demise of Constantine XI (r. 1449-1453 CE) and
- The fall of Constantinople to the Ottoman Turks in 1453 CE.
Everything started when the Romans ousted their Etruscan vanquishers in 509 B.C.E. Focused north of Rome, the Etruscans had administered over the Romans for many years. When free, the Romans built up a republic, an administration where residents chose agents for rule for their benefit.
