Answer:
Bank B for the car loan and Bank A for the savings account
Explanation:
The reason why this would be your answer is because when you are opening a savings account, you want to make sure that the interest is high. However, when you get a new car, you want to make sure that the interest is low. Bank B provides a low interest rate, while Bank A provides a high interest rate.
Why are the two the opposite? Here's the answer:
Why you should get a high interest rate for a savings account:
You should get a high interest rate for the savings account because the interest you have for the savings account is the money that the bank will give you, so it's pretty much free money that the bank is giving you for having your money saved in their bank. If you want to get more money from the bank because of your savings account, then you should find one with a high interest rate
<span>Some of the actions taken by the Monsanto Corporation to control the seed industry are: Purchasing of competing seed companies. Application of patents on Monsanto seeds. Forcing farmers to purchase new seed yearly instead of re-sowing existing seed. And lobbying for legislation in seed handling that favors Monsanto's processes.</span>
Answer:
Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.
- Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.
Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?
- A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).
Explanation:
we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:
Swiss Rails
add train do not add train
$1,500 / $2,000 /
add train $4,000 $7,500
EuroRail
do not add train $4,000 / $3,000 /
$2,000 $3,000
Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.
Answer:
B) 574,000
Explanation:
Equipment book of Paar value on december 31/14 of $294,000.-
Add Kimmels equipment book value on december 31/14 of $190,00
Add original acquisition-date allocation to Kimmel´s equipment of ($400,000 - $272,000) = $128,000
Less Amortization of alloction ($128,000 / 10 years for 3 years) = (38,400)
Eqcuals consolidated equipment of $574,000
