Answer:
The United States has consistently run a trade deficit for the past forty years and the trade deficit fall is explained below in details.
Explanation:
The United States commerce deficit fell for the initial time in six ages in 2019 as President Donald Trump pounded China with import expenses. The Commerce Department said Monday that the hole among what the United States trades and what it purchases abroad dropped 1.8% last year to $626.9 billion.
All the money available in the United States is called Money Supply or could be the economy.
Answer:
60 percent
Explanation:
Contribution margin refers to the revenue a firm derives after deducting the variable cost it has incurred.
Contribution margin = Sales - Variable costs
Contribution margin or contribution to sales ratio represents the percentage of contribution a firm earns from the sale of it's output.
It is represented mathematically as,
= 
Also, contribution margin ratio = 100 - variable cost ratio percentage.
Hence, contribution margin for three departments would be:
A = 100 - 30% = 70%
B = 100 - 40% = 60%
C = 100- 50% = 50%
This represents if sales revenue is 100, contribution margin earned is 70, 60 and 50 under three cases.
Since sales revenue in all three departments is the same, let us assume the sales revenue of a department as y.
Thus, weighted average contribution margin would be, 60 percent
They are considered to be functional managers—a functional
manager is those people with authority that are given to them in a way of
controlling a certain department, business or organization, in other words,
they have to manage an organizational unit.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": willing to pay money (reduce their income) to enforce their own sense of fairness.
Explanation:
The "ultimatum game" is an economic strategy in which two individuals are gathered knowing they will see each other only once. The first individual is in charge of proposing an offer on diving an amount of money. If the second individual rejects the offer neither one of them gets anything. If the second individual accepts the offer, the first individual obtains what was demanded and the rest goes for the second individual.
Thus, <em>the "ultimatum game" shows how someone (the second individual) could turn down a unique offer that does not meet his or her demands. This, with plain knowledge the offer another individual could provide, might be worse, thus, reducing the chances to obtain what is desired for defending his or her sense of fairness.</em>
