Answerddsadasd
Step-by-step explanation:
heheheheh ahhahaha
Answer:
About 4 students completed the walk.
Step-by-step explanation:
0.72%=0.0072
0.0072*560=4.032
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
In statistics, about 68 percent of values come in one standard deviation of the mean by using a standard normal model. Approximately 95% of the data were all within two standard deviations from the mean. Almost all of the data are in the range of three standard deviations of the mean (roughly 99.7%).
The 68-95-99.7 law, also known as the Empirical Rule, is based on this evidence. 68 percent of the data values of a naturally distributed data collection of small children with a mean of 8.2 and a standard deviation of 10.8 would be between -2.2 and 19.0.
Within a mean of 14.1 as well as a standard deviation of 8.2, 68 percent of the data values in a usually distributed data collection of older children would be between 5.9 and 22.3.
However, we cannot conclude that the data is naturally distributed since the real actual data vary from the usual normal curve computed above.
Hence, various measures like either goodness of fit or theory testing, would be used for this.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
x-intercepts are SOLUTIONS to a quadratic whereas when you put those solutions into factor form (in a set of parenthesis), you have the FACTORS of the quadratic. They are the same thing generally, they are just written in different forms. For example, if a solution to a quadratic is x = 3, it has been understood that x = 3 when y = 0. Therefore, if x - 3 = y and y = 0, then x - 3 = 0. Solving that for x, you get x = 3. That factor of x = 3 is (x - 3).
Following that logic, for a:
If the x intercepts are x = 0 and x = 3, it is understood that x + 0 = 0 so x = 0 and the factor is (x + 0) (it could also be x - 0 since adding 0 is the same as subtracting 0); if x = 3 it is understood that x - 3 = 0 and the factor is (x - 3).
For b:
If the x-intercepts are x = -1 and x = 1, then originally the factors were (x + 1) and (x - 1). Again, set each of those equal to 0 and solve for x (THE X-INTERCEPT EXISTS WHERE Y = 0!)
For c:
If the x-intercepts are x = -5 and x = 10, then originally the factors were (x + 5) and (x - 10).
For d:
If the x-intercept is a fraction, do the same thing:
x = 1/2 so
x - 1/2 = 0 Now multiply both the x and the 1/2 by a 2 to get the factor (2x - 1) and the other factor from x = 4 is (x - 4)
