1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
s2008m [1.1K]
3 years ago
15

Solve the equation: x-10 - 2x + 7 = 8 + x - 10 - 3x

Mathematics
2 answers:
Minchanka [31]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: If you're looking for the value of x, it's 1.

Step-by-step explanation:

Add the numbers. x-10-2x+7=8+x-10-3x--->x-3-2x=8+x-10-3x

Combine like terms. x-3-2x=8+x-10-3x ---> -x-3=8+x-10-3x

Subtract the numbers.-x-3=8+x-10-3x---> -x-3=-2+x-3x

Combine like terms. -x-3=-2+-3x---> -x-3=-2-2x

Rearrange terms. -x-3=-2-2x---> -x-3=-2x-2

Hope that helps!

masya89 [10]3 years ago
4 0
You gotta collect the like terms in order to simplify the answer...

So you have: 8 + x - 10 - 3x

Like terms in this are: x, - 3x ( we have a positive x and a negative 3x) remember x represents 1 so it’ll be 1 - 3x= -2x

And 8 -10= -2

Your answer is -2x - 2

Hope that helps :)
You might be interested in
Pls help, urgent<br> Find the value of x and pls explain it fully
Alchen [17]

Answer:

answer :36

Step-by-step explanation:

opp exterior angles are equal............

6 0
2 years ago
Price of a jeep dropped from 27000 to 22900. What was the percent decrease in price nearest hundredth percent?
34kurt

Answer:

(27,000 - 22,900)/27,000 = 0.1519 or 15.19% decrease in price.

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
kayla bought H number of hats for $13.25 each.if she has 50 to spend ,how many hats could she have bought?
lord [1]
She can only buy 3 which is 13.25x3=39.75 if you do times 4 than it will be 54 which is not enough
7 0
4 years ago
The following information is used for questions 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22: You come up with what you think is a great idea for a new
Olenka [21]

Answer:

a) A Type II error happens when the null hypothesis failed to be rejected even  when the alternative hypothesis is true (<em>false negative</em>).

In this case the ad was effective (true alternative hypothesis), but the results of the sample had no enough statistical evidence to prove that the ad really had an effect increasing sales (reject the null hypothesis).

b) No. This type of errors are not evident, as the study is conduct to infere characteristics of the population. As it is an inference, there is not 100% accurate, and there is a probability of making this type of errors.

The only thing it can be done is limiting the probability of making this errors (type I and type II), affecting the power of the test (to affect Type II error) and the significance level (to affect Type I error). Obviously there is a trade-off, and minimizing one type of error increases the probability of making the other type.

c) The business consequences are that an effective ad campaign is not recognize and a business opportunity is lost. The ad would have been effective, but the study wasn't capable of demostrating its efectiveness.

d) One explanation could be a sample size not big enough. Increasing the sample size increases the power of the test, which decrease the probability of making a Type II error.

Other explanation could be a significance level that was too conservative (very low significance level). That means that the sample result was not considered a unlikely result becuase the threshold for unlikely results was set to a very low probability. This minimizes the probability of making a Type I error, but makes harder for true alternative hypothesis to be demonstrated.

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
which of the following properties could be used to rewrite the expression (2/3•1/5)•5/2 as 2/3•(5/2•(5/2•1/5) sorry to ask Su ma
slamgirl [31]
The original expression is given by:
 ( \frac{2}{3}*\frac{1}{5})*\frac{5}{2}
 The correct way to rewrite the expression is given by:
 \frac{2}{3}*(\frac{5}{2}*\frac{1}{5})&#10;
 For this, we use two properties:

 Associative property:
 The way of grouping the factors does not change the result of the multiplication:
 \frac{2}{3}*(\frac{1}{5}*\frac{5}{2})

 Commutative property:
 
The order of the factors does not vary the product:
 \frac{2}{3}*(\frac{5}{2}*\frac{1}{5})
8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • If pie-0 =3.14159265359 what is pie time 160=
    9·2 answers
  • What is J <br> 6-7j-19= -83
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following could not be a valid solution to a compound inequality
    12·1 answer
  • Please Help Me, I Cant Even Do the First Step Of The Problem :(
    13·1 answer
  • If you borrow $1,700 at 7% simple interest, how much interest will you pay?
    14·2 answers
  • 4. The circumference of a circle is 1287.<br> Find the EXACT length of the diameter.
    5·1 answer
  • 8g - 24d please help!
    9·1 answer
  • On a family outing, Tyler bought 5 cups of hot cocoa and 4 pretzels for $18.40.
    12·1 answer
  • PLS HELP ME I WiLL MARK THE BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • for a child, the regular admission price to a zoo is 13. With a special pass, the admission price is discounted to 20%. What is
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!