The estimate-talk-estimate approach (ETE), commonly known as the Delphi method, is a structured and qualitative method of forecasting that involves asking a group of experts a series of questions to elicit their thoughts. The Delphi method depends on experts who are educated about a certain subject in order for them to make predictions about the outcomes of hypothetical future scenarios, assess the possibility of an event, or come to an agreement on a given subject.
The Delphi method approach entails a number of rounds of written questionnaires that invite expert input. Following the completion of each set of questionnaires by the experts, the facilitator compiles all the responses and provides a summary report of the results to each expert. The experts next go over the summary report and decide whether they concur with the other experts' responses or not.
The experts then complete a second questionnaire that allows them to express updated perspectives based on what they have learned from the summary report. The estimate-talk-estimate approach (ETE), commonly known as the Delphi method, is a structured and qualitative method of forecasting that involves asking a group When a forecast consensus is reached, the Delphi process is finished.
Learn more about Delphi method here
brainly.com/question/28126891
#SPJ9
<span>The main reason for the Spanish colonizers manage to tap the wealth of measoamerica and the andes is,
By capitalizing on preexisting systems of tribute and labor discipline.
Spanish colonizers capitalized on preexisting systems of tribute and labor discipline to tap the enormous wealth of mesoamerica and the Andes. Once native rulers were overthrown, the Spanish monarchs transferred their institutions—municipal councils, the legal code, and the Catholic Church—to America.</span>
Answer:
Alexander was “great” because he easily conquered a lot of land and established prominent societies, like Alexandria.
Alexander wasn’t “great” because he was egotistical in naming a city after him and conquering land just for greed.
Alexander was “great” because he was smart enough to cross the river and use Porus’ own elephants against him.
Alexander was not “great” because he tricked a ruler and killed many men in war only because he was greedy and wanted more land.
Alexander was most likely very religious, and it seems that in Ancient Greek anyone seeking refuge in a temple should be shown mercy. Also, if Alexander had killed everyone in the city than there would have been no point in conquering the city except for land.
Yes they did many of them
