One argument for is that exports help improve the terms of trade of a country and also opens markets for domestic producers, meaning they can grow, employ more workers, earn more income, etc. Another argument for is that it increases competition, as there are goods coming in from all corners of the world, which may pressure domestic pressures to be more competitive and innovative with their products, improving its quality and product choice.
An argument for protectionism could be that imports may actually be harming domestic producers, which as we can see from President Trump's rhetoric, we can deduce that cheap imports from China will take sales revenue away from American producers and potentially cause them to lose customers and close down. Another argument for is that quotas and tariffs will make imports more expensive, which may make domestic products more price competitive.
Regarding the opinions, come up with it yourself. Think of the pros and cons and make a balanced judgement.
The answer to the question is the "Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award". This is the type of award that was granted or given by the president of the United States to organizations that implement and are judged to be outstanding in specific managerial tasks such as will result in the improvement of products and services.
Answer:
D. can result in a negative value for the coefficient of the included variable, even though the coefficient will have a significant positive effect on Y if the omitted variable were included
Explanation:
Answer: Participation strategy
Explanation: Participation strategy refers to the strategy in which the management tries to make all the individuals in a group to collectively work for the accomplishment of a goal. It refers to associate the workers in an objective to give them a sense of superiority and belongingness towards that goal.
In the given case, Gilbert is trying to make the employees to fell the awareness towards the project by taking their ideas ans suggestions into consideration.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is E.
Explanation:
I would say may 6th because Sam didn't know Ralph was going to revoke until May 5th and that only makes it half final because Ralph wouldn't know in anyway except through a letter that Sam has received his letter and agreed or disagreed.
May 6th is when he gets the confirmation. So both people know on May 6th.
If this is too confusing ( like it was for me I had to read it 6 times ) then think about it this way. if you make a deal with a fisherman to buy fish on Wednesday and you send him a lettering sunday that arrives a day later, the fisherman won't know until a day later (Monday) and on that day he receives it you don't know if he got it. That's why it's half official. when he send a letter that arrives the day after he got your letter (tuesday) then you know that he understood you won't make it on Wednesday making it fully official.
does this make sense? if so hope it helps.
