Answer:
The marginal propensity to save (MPS) is the portion of each extra dollar of a household's income that's saved. MPC is the portion of each extra dollar of a household's income that is consumed or spent. Consumer behavior concerning saving or spending has a very significant impact on the economy as a whole.
Multiplier Effect
for every dollar the government spends, it will create a greater than one dollar change in GDP
Spending Multiplier
1 / 1-MPC or 1 / MPS; increase in spending .: + multiplier; decrease in spending .: - multiplier
Deficit spending is the amount by which spending exceeds revenue over a particular period of time, also called simply deficit.
Crowding out in businesses an economic concept that describes a situation where personal consumption of goods and services and investments by business are reduced because of increases in government spending and deficit financing sucking up available financial resources and raising interest rates.
Explanation: Marginal Propensity to Consume
the fraction of any change in disposable income that is consumed; MPC = change in C / change in DI
Marginal Propensity to Save
the fraction of any change in disposable income that is saved; MPS = change is S / change in DI
Answer:
The objective of present Value is to present a set of cash flows based on their estimated fair value; to help decision makers in assessing the viability or otherwise of an option of investments.
Values don't stay the same year on year, various influences act to most times make the same $ amount lessened by tomorrows valuation; some factors like inflation, obsolescence, opportunity cost of not investing in other activities (cost of capital)....all these play a role in determining time value of money.
Present value attempts to harmonize all these influences and present a fair value of our $ dollar estimate of future values based on the impact of these factors.
Answer and Explanation:
In the given case, the second will would be destroyed non-intentionally by the testatrix that represent the person who writes the will. Also the second will would have be intended to revoke the first will
In addition to this, Testatrix intends the second will to be value also at the same time she dont want the first will to be probated
So the second will would be upheld because of testamentary motive.
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
From the above information, we can deduce that the stock owned by Carol and Dave falls in value by $2,000 I.e ($10,000 - $8,000) ; it is to be noted that Carol solely has realised and recognized loss of $2,000.
Here, one of the cogent factors that determines whether a sale has taken place is if realization has been effected. Here, stock sold by Carol qualifies as a disposition while the decline in the value of stock sold by Dave does not qualify as disposition.
With regards to the foregoing, we can conclude that the federal income tax law treat the decline in the value of the stock differently for Carol and Dave.
