Let's have the first number, the larger number, be <em>x</em>. We'll have the second, smaller number be <em>y</em>.
We know that x = y + 6, since x is 6 greater than y.
We also know that 330 = x + y.
Because x = y + 6, 330 = y + 6 + y, which simplifies to 330 = 2y + 6.
Now all we need to do is simplify the equation. First, we subtract 6 from both sides:
330 - 6 = 324
2y + 6 - 6 = 2y.
So we have 324 = 2y. Then we divide both sides by 2 to get:
162 = y
Plug in y = 162 into the equation x = y + 6 to get:
x = 162 + 6
x = 168
Let's check to make sure our answer is right. 168 is 6 more than 162. 162 + 168 equals 330. So our two numbers are 168 and 162.
Answer:
Inverse proportionality relationship
Step-by-step explanation:
SInce I equals 50 divided by t, we see "t in the denominator, which corresponds to an INVERSE proportionality between these variables (I and t)
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
-We can use the exponential decay function to estimate the size after 13 years:
Where:
is the size after t years, t is the time, r is the rate of decay and 
the original size.
#We substitute and calculate as:
Hence, the forest covers after 13 years.
'Commutative' means you can work it in the other direction without changing it.
But 1/2 is not the same number as 2/1 . So I guess division is NOT commutative.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
In the diagram
Equate
