Answer:
The conclusion "T" logically follows from the premises given and the argument is valid
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us use notations to represent the steps
P: I take a bus
Q: I take the subway
R: I will be late for my appointment
S: I take a taxi
T: I will be broke
The given statement in symbolic form can be written as,
(P V Q) → R
S → (¬R ∧ T)
(¬Q ∧ ¬P) → S
¬R
___________________
∴ T
PROOF:
1. (¬Q ∧ ¬P) → S Premise
2. S → (¬R ∧ T) Premise
3. (¬Q ∧ ¬P) → (¬R ∧ T) (1), (2), Chain Rule
4. ¬(P ∨ Q) → (¬R ∧ T) (3), DeMorgan's law
5. (P ∨ Q) → R Premise
6. ¬R Premise
7. ¬(P ∨ Q) (5), (6), Modus Tollen's rule
8. ¬R ∧ T (4), (7), Modus Ponen's rule
9. T (8), Rule of Conjunction
Therefore the conclusion "T" logically follows from the given premises and the argument is valid.
Answer:
0.70275
Step-by-step explanation:
Data provided in the question:
4e²ˣ⁻¹ -1 = 5
now solving for 'x'
⇒ 4e²ˣ⁻¹ = 5 + 1
or
⇒ 4e²ˣ⁻¹ = 6
or
⇒ 
or
⇒ 
now,
taking natural log both sides, we get
⇒ 2x - 1 = 
also,
we know
⇒
thus,
⇒ 2x - 1 = ln(3) - ln(2)
or
⇒ 2x - 1 = 1.0986 - 0.6931
or
⇒ 2x - 1 = 0.4055
or
⇒ 2x = 0.4055 + 1
or
⇒ 2x = 1.4055
or
⇒ x = 0.70275
X = 60°
To work this out, you would do 50°+70° to get 120°. You would then subtract this from 180° (the total for any triangle) to get the final answer of 60°.
I'm pretty sure it's 0.04, 0.044, 0.4, 0.404, 0.44, 0.444.
Answer:
She is not breaking even. The discounted price is .84t, which is less than t.
Step-by-step explanation:
Retail price= 1.4
1.4×.4= .56
40% of 1.4 is .56
Subtract 40% of 1.4 from the retail price because she is marking down.
(1.4)-(.56)=.84
So the discounted price is .84t
This problem is difficult because we don't know if she sold any tea by the retail price and if she did how much did she sell.