5) The relation between intensity and current appears linear for intensity of 300 or more (current = intensity/10). For intensity of 150, current is less than that linear relation would predict. This seems to support the notion that current will go to zero for zero intensity. Current might even be negative for zero intensity since the line through the points (300, 30) and (150, 10) will have a negative intercept (-10) when current is zero.
Usually, we expect no output from a power-translating device when there is no input, so we expect current = 0 when intensity = 0.
6) We have no reason to believe the linear relation will not continue to hold for values of intensity near those already shown. We expect the current to be 100 for in intensity of 1000.
8) Apparently, times were only measured for 1, 3, 6, 8, and 12 laps. The author of the graph did not want to extrapolate beyond the data collected--a reasonable choice.
The amount add to the borrower's monthly payment is $313.33.
Given that lender requires PMI that is 0.8% of the loan amount of $470,000.
A loan's PMI, or personal mortgage insurance, is a type of mortgage insurance used by lenders when making traditional loans such as home loans. A PMI helps cover the loss to the lender (bank) if the borrower stops making monthly mortgage payments on their home loan. Therefore, the PMI can be described as a kind of risk mitigation tool for the bank when the borrower defaults on their EMIs (monthly mortgage payments). So, PMI for a borrower is an additional cost or payment for the borrower on top of his monthly payments i.e. EMI.
Thus, the additional amount of dollars that the borrower has to pay for the PMI on his loan along with his monthly mortgage payments
= Principal Loan amount × (PMI/12)
= $470,000 × (0.8%/12)
= $470,000 × (0.008/12)
= $470,000 × 0.0006666667
=$313.333349
Hence, the additional monthly payment for PMI where lender requires PMI that is 0.8% of the loan amount of $470,000 is $313.33.
Learn more about mortgage payment from here brainly.com/question/10400598
#SPJ1
Step-by-step explanation:
factor 4 out of the variable terms, as this helps.
but my approach is simply to define the target and then calculate "backwards".
we want to find
(ax + b)² = a²x² + 2abx + b²
and now we compare with the original equation :
a²x² = 4x²
a² = 4
a = 2
2abx = 16x
2×2×bx = 16x
4b = 16
b = 4
b² = 16, but we have only 3, so we need to subtract 16-3 = 13 from the completed square.
so, our equation is
(2x + 4)² - 13 = 0
(2x + 4)² = 13
2x + 4 = sqrt(13)
2x = sqrt(13) - 4
x = sqrt(13)/2 - 2
Half of perimeter (or length+ width) is:
222 mm /2= 111 mm.
111 mm- 60 mm= 51 mm
The width of the rectangle is 51 mm~
