Answer: HDLs are antiatherogenic lipoproteins....
Explanation:
The anti-atherogenic effect of HDL occurs, above all, because of its properties to carry lipids, mainly cholesterol esters from peripheral tissues to the liver, which is known as reverse cholesterol transport(RCT). However, other protective actions of HDL, in addition to RCT, have been described in several experimental models and epidemiological studies. These actions include antioxidant protection, mediation of cholesterol efflux, inhibition of the expression of cell adhesion, leukocyte activation, regulation of blood coagulation and platelet activity.
Somatic mutations are important to the evolutionary process; most cancers result from somatic mutations : True
What is somatic mutations?
Any mutation that happens in a cell other than a gamete, germ cell, or gametocyte is referred to as a somatic mutation because it involves a change in the DNA sequence of a somatic cell of a multicellular organism with dedicated reproductive cells. Somatic mutations are typically not passed on to descendants, in contrast to germline mutations, which can be transmitted to an organism's offspring. Plants, which lack a separate germline, and animals that can reproduce asexually by processes like budding, as in the case of members of the cnidarian genus Hydra, obfuscate this distinction.
The descendants of a cell inside the same organism will all carry somatic mutations, even if somatic mutations are not passed on to an organism's progeny.
Learn more about the somatic mutations with the help of the given link:-
brainly.com/question/12826730
#SPJ4
Answer:
What is the question you need help with?
Explanation:
Answer:
abnormal amounts of the growth hormone can lead to developmental issues
Explanation:
Answer:
One of the conditions that she describe
was induced heart failure, which is basically a “broken heart.” She says that human doctors apparently discovered that this is true in humans around 2000. However, veterinarians had recognized this in the earlier 1970s. This just goes to show that there are more correlations between the two than people realize and could help substantially.
Do you find Dr. Natterson-Horowitz's argument that physicians can learn a lot from veterinarians convincing? What part of her argument is, to you, especially strong or
weak?
I think that her argument is extremely convincing and I definitely agree with her. Her statements about how she performed
the same functions on both humans and other animals helped portray the argument she was making but was also a strong point. I also thought that her naming the three
conditions was very strong
Explanation:
