Answer: 10
Step-by-step explanation:
Since integral from 1 to 4 of f(x) =10
To evaluate integral from 2 to 8 of 2 times f(2x), using substitution method
Let U = 2x, dU = 2dx, dx = dU/2
Evaluate the limit, upper limit gives dU = 2*4 = 8, lower limit gives dU = 2*1 = 2.
Since this limit are the same as the limit for the question,
Therefore, F(4) - F(1) = F(8) - F(2) = 10
Substituting dx=dU/2
Gives,
Integral from 2 to 8 of 2 times f(2x)= (1/2)(2)(F(8)-F(2)) = 10
Answer:
The answer is definitely C
Step-by-step explanation:
Following the system of inequalities will graph this solution best on the graph, it is the inequality represented in the graph.
ur wlcm :)
correct me if im wrong
brainliest please?
The triangle pay $32 more for that day than it paid per day during the first period of time.
Step-by-step explanation:
The given is,
Triangle Construction pays Square Insurance $5,980
To insure a construction site for 92 days
To extend the insurance beyond the 92 days costs $97 per day
Triangle extends the insurance by 1 day
Step:1
Insurance per day from the 92 days period,

Where, Total insurance for 92 days = $ 5,980
Period = 92 days
From the values, equation becomes,

= $ 65 per day
Step:2
Insurance per day after the 92 days,
= $ 97
Amount Pay for that day than it paid per day during the first period of time,

= $32
Result:
The triangle pay $32 more for that day than it paid per day during the first period of time, if the Triangle Construction pays Square Insurance $5,980
to insure a construction site for 92 days and to extend the insurance beyond the 92 days costs $97 per day.
The answer is an Equilateral Triangle. I believe.
Answer:
This contradict of the chain rule.
Step-by-step explanation:
The given functions are
It is given that,
According to chin rule,
It means,
is differentiable if f(g(c)) and g(c) is differentiable at x=c.
Here g(x) is not differentiable at x=0 but both compositions are differentiable, which is a contradiction of the chain rule