I believe the correct answer is: high self-monitoring
Mark Snyder, American social psychologist, introduced the
concept of self-monitoring during the 1970s to show how much people monitor
their self-presentations, expressive behavior, and nonverbal affective displays.
He stated in his studies that self-monitoring can be:
1. high self-monitoring
2. low self-monitoring
High self-monitoring individuals closely monitor themselves
and behave in a manner that is highly responsive to social cues and their
situational context.
In this case, Sally is high self-monitoring as she examines
a situation for cues of how she should react, and then tries to meet the
demands of the situation rather than act on her own feelings, before she acts
or speaks.
Answer:
Yes. Southam's research was "more wrong"
Explanation:
They both didn't seek the informed consent of their patients and we're both wrong. However, Southam injected patients(both healthy and unhealthy) with cancerous cells to see how their bodies would react. This was terribly wrong seeing that he put unsuspecting patients in danger. Elsie on the other hand, collected tissue samples from his patients to conduct his research which is a clear violation of their rights but clearly not as deadly as Southam's.
Answer: PROBATION
Explanation: Probation is Court sentence given to a convicted person allowing him or her to remain in a community under the supervision of a Law enforcement officer called the PROBATION OFFICER.
Probation can be classified into INFORMAL, SUPERVISED, SHOCK AND COMMUNITY CONTROL.
During the period of Probation,the person or persons involved are monitored to ensure that they comply with all the terms of the Probation as ordered by the Court.
Answer: Bolivia, Bulgaria, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Egypt, Greece, Gabon, Guatemala, Libya, Honduras, and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Explanation: :) :D
