Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
Answer:
18 minutes
Step-by-step explanation:
Sophie can peel all potatoes in 45 minutes, in 1 minute she can peel:
Simon can peel all potatoes in 30 minutes, in 1 minute he can peel:
Together, in 1 minute they can peel:
- 1/45+1/30= 2/90+3/90= 5/90= 1/18 of all the potatoes
To peel all the potatoes they need:
- 1 ÷ 1/18= 1 × 18= 18 minutes
So it will take them 18 minutes to peel all the potatoes
41, because the ratio is the same
Answer:
m<GFA = 110
Step-by-step explanation:
1. ABCD - parallelogram Definition of a parallelogram
(AB ll CD) (AD ll BC)
2. m<B + m<C = 180 Consectuive angles in a
110 + m<C = 180 parallelogram are supplementary
m<C = 70
3. m<GCB = 1/2 m<C Definition of angles bisector
m<GCB = 70
4. m<B = m<D = 110 Opposite angles in a
parrallelogram are congruent
5. m<CDG = 1/2 m<D Defintion of an angle bisector
m<CDG = 55
6. m<GCB+m<CDG+m<CGD=180 Sum of anlges in a triangle (ΔCDG)
70 + 55 + m<CGD = 180
125 + m<CGD = 180
m<CGD = 55
7. m<CGD + m<DGF = 180 Linear pair, supplmentary angles
55 + m<DGF = 180
m<DGF = 125
8. m<C = m<A = 70 Opposite angles in a paralellogram
are congruent
9. m<ADG = 1/2m<D Definiton of an angle bisector
m<ADG = 55
10.m<ADG+m<DFG+m<GFA+m<A=360 Sum of angles in quadrilateral
55 + 125 + m<GFA + 70 = 360 DGFA
m<GFA + 250 = 360
m<GFA = 110
Answer:
The formula 
Step-by-step explanation:
<em><u>Explanation</u></em>
Given W = x² - 2 y z
2 y z = x² + W
Dividing '2z' on both sides , we get

⇒ 