Answer:
no, because for x=-3, y would have to be -31
Step-by-step explanation:
boy oh boy (or girl oh girl) - you wrote this in a horrible, horrible format.
I can only guess what your problem and the fitting answer would be.
y = -2×x^2 + 3×x - 4
-4 = -2×(-3)^2 + 3×(-3) - 4
-4 = -2×9 - 9 - 4
-4 = -18 - 9 - 4
-4 = -31
and that is wrong. for (-3,-4) to be on the graph of the function, y would have to be -4 when using x=-3 in the function. but y = -31 for x= -3.
As y varies directly with x, there is a proportionality constant. As x increases by that certain constant, y also increases. We equate:
y = kx
where k = proportionality constant.
Given the condition, y = 5 when x = 4, then we solve for k:
5 = k(4)
k = 5/4 or 1.25
When y = 8, then
8 = (5/4)(x)
x = 8/(5/4) = (8)(4/5) = 32/5 or 6.4 (ANSWER)
Answer:
(0,0), or A
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the function { x - 3, y - 1 }:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
79.5%
Step-by-step explanation:
