The answer to this question would be theories.
Research finding must be plausible. That means that there is a theory that can explain why did you get that result. Without it, the research findings will be suspicious and it is hard to be falsifiable. Sometimes the findings are just purely coincidental.
The answer is<u> "gangs that control a certain neighborhood".</u>
Territorial gangs are among the present principle culprits of urban savagery, influencing the lives of a large number of other individuals. They endeavor to pick up control of a domain in which they at that point manage every single criminal action and additionally 'ensure' the general population. Such groups are found to contrasting degrees on each mainland, in spite of the fact that those given the most media consideration work in Central America. The violence that they cause majorly affects the populace when all is said in done and on their individuals' families, and on the individuals themselves.
There isn’t any work attached so I’m not quite sure what facts there is to gather? Sos
