Answer:
0.004462m²
612000m²
0.0482m²
Step-by-step explanation:
Using the conversion
1mm² = 10^-6m²
4462mm² = x
Cross multiply
1 * x = 4462 * 10^-6
x = 4462 * 10^-6
x = 4.462 * 10^3 * 10^-6
x = 4.462*10^{3-6}
x = 4.462*10^-3
x = 0.004462m²
Hence 4462 mm² in m² is 0.004462m²
0.612 km² in m²
1km² = 10^6m²
0.612km² = y
Cross multiply
1 * y = 0.612 * 10^6
y = 0.612*1,000,000
y = 612000m²
Hence 0.612 km² in m² is 612000m²
482 cm² in m²
1cm² = 0.0001m²
482 cm² = z
z = 482 * 0.0001
z = 0.0482m²
Hence 482 cm² in m² is 0.0482m²
Answer:
Refexive I think
Step-by-step explanation:
5(3) = 3(5)
or
x(y) = y(x)
I found this
"Anything equals itself: this is the "reflexive" (reflecting onto itself) property. Also, it doesn't matter which order the equality is in; if x = y, then y = x: this is the "symmetric" (they match) property."
Answer:
(1) D.Angle C is congruent to to Angle F. (2) C. SSS. (3) C. cannot be congruent to.
Step-by-step explanation:
1)
From the given figure it is noticed that


According to SAS postulate, if two sides and the included angle of one triangle are congruent to two sides and the included angle of another triangle, then both triangles are congruent.
The included angles of congruent sides are angle C and angle G.
So, condition "Angle C is congruent to to Angle F" will prove that the ∆ABC and ∆EFG are congruent by the SAS criterion.
2)
If 
According to SSS postulate, if all three sides in one triangle are congruent to the corresponding sides in the other.
Since two corresponding sides are congruent but third sides of triangles are not congruent, therefore SSS criterion for congruence is violated.
3)
Since two corresponding sides are congruent but third sides of triangles are not congruent, therefore the included angle of congruent sides are different.

Therefore angle C and angle F cannot be congruent to each other.
2/9 is less than 2/5 because since the denominator is larger, the pieces are smaller. (Numerator)