Answer:
I hope this helps!
Please make sure this is right I only have 6 questions :)
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
(x + 6, y + 0), 180° rotation, reflection over the x‐axis
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer can be found out simply , a trapezoid has its horizontal sides usually parallel meanwhile the vertical sides are not parallel.
The horizontal parallel sides are on the x-axis.
Reflection over y- axis would leave the trapezoid in a vertical position such that the trapezoid ABCD won't be carried on the transformed trapezoid as shown in figure.
So option 1 and 2 are removed.
Now, a 90 degree rotation would leave the trapezoid in a vertical position again so its not suitable again.
In,The final option (x + 6, y + 0), 180° rotation, reflection over the x‐axis, x+6 would allow the parallel sides to increase in value hence the trapezoid would increase in size,
180 degree rotation would leave the trapezoid in an opposite position and reflection over x-axis would bring it below the Original trapezoid. Hence, transformed trapezoid A`B`C`D` would carry original trapezoid ABCD onto itself
For the first part:
Every shirt she grabs, will cost her dollars, so if she grabs 3 shirts, then the cost of the shirts is:
With the same rationale, if she grabs 2 pairs of jeans, the cost of the jeans is:
So, her total is:
If you subtract 3 from the total, then the expression is:
For the second part:
If she's paying 3 less for each shirt, then the cost of 3 shirts will become:
In the same fashion, for the two jeans:
So the expression for the total cost is:
For number three:
The amounts are different because the cost of the total purchase is different than the cost of each element that makes up the total purchase.
For number four:
If you're the owner, you want to give the smallest amount of discount (the one in part 1/a).
So you could clarify by saying there's 3 dollars of the TOTAL purchase's cost.
Every shirt she grabs, will cost her dollars, so if she grabs 3 shirts, then the cost of the shirts is:
With the same rationale, if she grabs 2 pairs of jeans, the cost of the jeans is:
So, her total is:
If you subtract 3 from the total, then the expression is:
For the second part:
If she's paying 3 less for each shirt, then the cost of 3 shirts will become:
In the same fashion, for the two jeans:
So the expression for the total cost is:
For number three:
The amounts are different because the cost of the total purchase is different than the cost of each element that makes up the total purchase.
For number four:
If you're the owner, you want to give the smallest amount of discount (the one in part 1/a).
So you could clarify by saying there's 3 dollars of the TOTAL purchase's cost.