Answer:
The Proof is given below.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
bisect ∠ EHG.i.e
∴ ∠EHF ≅ ∠ GHF
To Prove:
Proof:
In Δ EHF and Δ GHF
EH ≅ GH ………............{Given}
∠ EHF ≅ ∠ GHF …………..{EF bisect ∠ EHG as given above}
HF ≅ HF ………............{Reflexive Property}
Δ EHF ≅ Δ GHF …................{ By Side-Angle-Side test}
∴ EF ≅ GF........{corresponding parts of congruent triangles (c.p.c.t).}
....... PROVED
Alternate interior angles are angles formed when two parallel or non-parallel lines are intersected by a transversal.
change the 6 ito - 6 by turning to left side then you will have -3 -6 now you can add them (- + -) is + so you can add them the sign of 6 is greater so the answer is -9
Question Completion:
SubID Memory1 Memory2
1 71 78
2 75 75
3 77 82
4 90 91
5 72 90
6 79 81
7 84 75
8 75 86
9 85 92
10 75 77
11 72 92
12 76 87
13 77 93
14 90 94
15 84 78
16 73 92
17 75 85
18 87 86
19 75 95
20 70 94
21 72 75
22 90 84
23 81 94
24 87 82
25 90 82
26 87 79
27 78 94
28 78 79
29 70 82
30 81 80
31 80 78
32 90 87
33 83 90
34 81 85
35 73 88
36 82 82
37 84 94
38 85 86
39 77 94
40 82 83
Answer:
Since the mean of Memory1 (reciting method) (79.8) is smaller than the mean of Memory2 (imagery method) (85.5), we can conclude that there is a significant difference in memory performance between the reciting method and the imagery method.
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
SubID Memory1 Memory2
1 71 78
2 75 75
3 77 82
4 90 91
5 72 90
6 79 81
7 84 75
8 75 86
9 85 92
10 75 77
11 72 92
12 76 87
13 77 93
14 90 94
15 84 78
16 73 92
17 75 85
18 87 86
19 75 95
20 70 94
21 72 75
22 90 84
23 81 94
24 87 82
25 90 82
26 87 79
27 78 94
28 78 79
29 70 82
30 81 80
31 80 78
32 90 87
33 83 90
34 81 85
35 73 88
36 82 82
37 84 94
38 85 86
39 77 94
40 82 83
Total 3,193 3,421
Mean 79.8 85.5
Difference in means = 5.7 (85.5 - 79.8)
