What is the purpose of scientific notation? How is scientific notation represented? Explain.

Mathematics

2 answers:

Dmitriy789 [7]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

What is the purpose of scientific notation?

"to make the numbers and quantities used easier to comprehend, to read and to write. " <----- Credits to: Yahoo

How is scientific notation represented?

"To start with, scientific notation is a form of expressing very small or large numbers in a simpler form." <--------- Credits to: Yahoo

Anit [1.1K]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation: The purpose of scientific notation is to make the numbers and quantities used easier to comprehend, to read and to write.

Express both numbers with the same power of ten.

Add the base numbers.

Bring the power of ten down to represent the new power of ten for the sum.

Simplify so that the base number is between 1 and 10.

You might be interested in

There are 10 boys and 10 girls in a classroom.

IgorLugansk [536]

Answer:

grgdhs s dix e8shecr d8 her e8d jshfvebzjd zirr sidhe r shudbe xu heyxuebxux bsuc eizbfjs xie disgruntled hehe I2bv hour grab bjau bro iske Ddbeusd zjw7 YZH2WH2 zop dq he

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Write a compound inequality that the graph could represent.

Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]

A solid dot on the graph of an inequality indicates that the number is contained within the inequality, so yo should use $\leq$ or $\geq$ to represent that situation, whereas a white dot indicates that the number is not contained within the inequality.

Our graph is telling us that $x$ is greater or equal than -1, and also $x$ is less than 3. So our inequality will be:

$-1 \leq x \leq 3$

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which equation is equivalent to the given equation?

emmainna [20.7K]

Answer:

D. (x – 3)^2 = 17

Step-by-step explanation:

We assume you want an equivalent to x^2 -6x = 8.

We can complete the square by adding the square of half the x-coefficient to both sides of the equation.

x^2 -6x +(-6/2)^2 = 8 +(-6/2)^2

(x -3)^2 = 17 . . . . simplify