1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ganezh [65]
3 years ago
12

What is the BEST estimate for the measure of angle c? A) 77 B) 88 C) 99 D) 111

Mathematics
1 answer:
Bad White [126]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

88

Step-by-step explanation:

Looks close to a right angle so 88 degrees most likely.

You might be interested in
Write the recursive formula for the following sequence:<br> 16, 8, 4, 2, ...
ludmilkaskok [199]

Answer:

Answer is in the image

HOPE IT HELPS, BE SAFE KIDDO :3

6 0
3 years ago
Last friday tony worked for seven and a half hours. Express this time as a fraction of the day.
tangare [24]
I got it to be .3125 or 31%. just convert that to a fraction and you got it. sorry I forget how to put that decimal into a fraction it's been a year:)
8 0
3 years ago
Translate this phrase into an algebraic expression.
Jlenok [28]

Answer:

24n + 3

Step-by-step explanation:

24n + 3

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Lucas conducted an experiment on the rate of water evaporation.he placed 500 mL of water in a measuring cup at room temperature
blondinia [14]
20 days cause 25 times 10 = 250, 250 times 2 = 500 which is 20 days of evaporatation.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Autism and Maternal Antidepressant Use A recent study41 compared 298 children with Autism Spectrum Disorder to 1507 randomly sel
Finger [1]

Answer:

(a) We conclude that there is a significant association between prenatal exposure to antidepressant medicine and the risk of autism at 5% significance level.

(b) Yes, we can conclude that prenatal exposure to antidepressant medicine increases the risk of autism in the child.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that Autism and Maternal Antidepressant Use A recent study 41 compared 298 children with Autism Spectrum Disorder to 1507 randomly selected control children without the disorder.

Of the children with autism, 20 of the mothers had used antidepressant drugs. Of the control children, 50 of the mothers had used the drugs.

Let p_1 = <u><em>proportion of mothers who had used drugs having Autism Spectrum Disorder in their children</em></u>.

p_2 = <u><em>proportion of mothers who had used drugs not having Autism Spectrum Disorder in their children</em></u>.

(a) Null Hypothesis, H_0 : p_1=p_2      {means that there is no significant association between prenatal exposure to antidepressant medicine and the risk of autism}

Alternate Hypothesis, H_A : p_1\neq p_2     {means that there is a significant association between prenatal exposure to antidepressant medicine and the risk of autism}

The test statistics that would be used here <u>Two-sample z test for</u> <u>proportions</u>;

                         T.S. =  \frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} } }  ~ N(0,1)

where, \hat p_1 = sample proportion of mothers who had used drugs having Autism Spectrum Disorder in their children = \frac{20}{298} = 0.067

\hat p_2 = sample proportion of mothers who had used drugs not having Autism Spectrum Disorder in their children = \frac{50}{1507} = 0.033

n_1 = sample of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder = 298

n_2 = sample of children without Autism Spectrum Disorder = 1507

So, <em><u>the test statistics</u></em>  =  \frac{(0.067-0.033)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.067(1-0.067)}{298}+\frac{0.033(1-0.033)}{1507} } }

                                       =  2.281

The value of z test statistics is 2.281.

<u>Now, at 5% significance level the z table gives critical values of -1.96 and 1.96 for two-tailed test.</u>

Since our test statistic doesn't lie within the range of critical values of z, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which <u>we reject our null hypothesis</u>.

Therefore, we conclude that there is a significant association between prenatal exposure to antidepressant medicine and the risk of autism.

(b) <u>Yes, we can conclude that prenatal exposure to antidepressant medicine increases the risk of autism in the child</u> because if we reconsider our hypothesis for one-tailed test in which the null hypothesis states that the prenatal exposure to antidepressant medicine does not increases the risk of autism in the child.

For this hypothesis also, our test statistics will be more than the critical value of z and due to which we reject our null hypothesis and conclude that prenatal exposure to antidepressant medicine increases the risk of autism.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Devon decided to rewrite the quadratic equation so that it could be simplified into a square in order to find the zeros.
    7·2 answers
  • Please help me I need it please answer it correctly please help me please
    5·1 answer
  • Solve the problem.
    8·1 answer
  • Does anybody know the answer to those two questions
    9·1 answer
  • C(n)=−6(− 1/3 ​ )^ n−1 <br> What is the second term in the sequence?
    5·1 answer
  • Kelly went on vacation to the Hamptons. She was curious about whether rich people own a lot of TVs, so she went door to door in
    15·1 answer
  • Solve the qn in attachment .​
    14·1 answer
  • A right triangle has a hypotenuse of 15 cm. What is the length for the missing leg if one of the two legs of the triangle is 5?
    6·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!