Answer:
<MBK because of the isosceles triangle theorem. If two sides of a triangle are congruent, it is isosceles, so the angles opposite them are also congruent.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
450
Step-by-step explanation:
Solution for What is 75 percent of 600:
75 percent * 600 =
(75:100)* 600 =
(75* 600):100 =
45000:100 = 450
Now we have: 75 percent of 600 = 450
Question: What is 75 percent of 600?
Percentage solution with steps:
Step 1: Our output value is 600.
Step 2: We represent the unknown value with $x$x.
Step 3: From step 1 above,$600=100\%$600=100%.
Step 4: Similarly, $x=75\%$x=75%.
Step 5: This results in a pair of simple equations:
$600=100\%(1)$600=100%(1).
$x=75\%(2)$x=75%(2).
Step 6: By dividing equation 1 by equation 2 and noting that both the RHS (right hand side) of both
equations have the same unit (%); we have
600
x=
100%
75%
Step 7: Again, the reciprocal of both sides gives
x
600=
75
100
Therefore, $75\%$75% of $600$600 is $450$
Answer:
b: 4
Step-by-step explanation:
i took the test on edge 2020
There appears to be a positive correlation between the number of hour spent studydng and the score on the test.
When identifying the independent and dependent quantities, we think about what would cause the other to change. The score on the test would not cause the number of hours spent studying to change; rather, the number of hours spent studying would cause the score to change. This means that the number of hours studying would be the independent quantity and the score would be the dependent quantity.
Plotting the graph with the time studying on the x-axis (independent) and the score on the y-axis (dependent) gives you the graph shown. You can see in the image that there seems to be a positive correlation; the data seem to generally be heading upward.
Answer:
- -3/13 ≈ -1/4
- -6/11 ≈ -1/2
- -7/9 ≈ -3/4
Step-by-step explanation:
We'll drop all the minus signs, since they don't contribute anything but distraction.
When numerators or denominators are relatively large, changing their value by 1 unit will have a relatively small effect on the value of the fraction. For example, ...
3/13 ≈ 3/12 = 1/4
If we compare the decimal values of these fractions, we see that ...
3/13 ≈ 0.230769... (6-digit repeating decimal)
The closest of the offered "reasonable estimate" fractions is 1/4 = 0.25.
__
Likewise, 6/11 ≈ 6/12 = 1/2. In decimal, these fractions are ...
6/11 = 0.54... (2-digit repeat)
1/2 = 0.5
__
We can also increase or decrease both numerator and denominator by the same amount to get a fraction with nearly the same value. This works best when the numbers are larger.
7/9 ≈ 6/8 = 3/4 . . . . . . both numerator and denominator decreased by 1
In decimal, these are ...
7/9 = 0.7... (1-digit repeat)
3/4 = 0.75