Answer:
c. deviance is a product of economic conditions and is culturally passed from one generation to the next.
Explanation:
In sociology, the cultural transmission perspective was developed first by University of Chicago theorists who analyzed the records of county juvenile court records and after this analysis they reached the conclusion that the r<u>ates of delinquency decreased as they were farther away from the center of the city while the rates remained stable across the city neighborhoods</u>. Then, they concluded that this happened because <u>there were some characteristics inside the city and the city environment that sustained this criminal behavior (most likely attributed to economic conditions). </u>Therefore, if we generalize this idea, they concluded that <u>the city acts as a host for deviant behavior and these behaviors and countercultures are passed from one generation to the next thanks to this system. </u>
Therefore, The cultural transmission perspective was developed in part from the research of a group of sociologists at the University of Chicago who concluded that c. deviance is a product of economic conditions and is culturally passed from one generation to the next.
The picture is not really clear
Answer:
They offered them free land in certain areas that were upriver.
Explanation:
The answer wold be High start-up costs.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question is incomplete because it does not include the Synergy lessons and readings, we can say the following.
The situation was the prohibition of the local government to organize a fundraising rally in the public square of the town, arguing that our school has the proper facilities to organize it. However, the idea to make it public was to invite the members of our community to participate to get more money for the social cause we wanted to support.
We could have done in the school premises with our families, but that would have limited the scope of the event.
So through synergy, we talk to many non-governmental groups and social groups of our community, and we united forces to talk to officials and get the authorization.
Once we had the OK, we split responsibilities and allow each group to do what they needed to do based on its experience and people's skills.
So, trusting each other, sharing our resources, and leaving egos out of the question, we could unite and have a great event with the participation of the citizens in public property.
