Answer:
COULDN'T: (1) persons under 18 years of age, persons who have been determined mentally incompetent by a court, subject to such exceptions as the Legislature may make,persons convicted of any felony, subject to such exceptions as the Legislature may make.
COULD: Every person subject to none of the disqualifications shall be deemed a qualified voter; provided, however, that before offering to vote at an election a voter shall have registered, but such requirement for registration shall not be considered a qualification of a voter within the meaning of the term "qualified voter" as used in any other Article of this Constitution in respect to any matter except qualification and eligibility to vote at an election.The Legislature may authorize absentee voting. The privilege of free suffrage shall be protected by laws regulating elections and prohibiting under adequate penalties all undue influence in elections from power, bribery, tumult, or other improper practice.
Explanation:
Lloyd George and his Tory supporters, however, saw British control <span>over </span>Palestine<span> as much more attractive than the proposed British-French condominium.</span>
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
The overjustification effect is a term in psychology that is described as an act when used diminishes intrinsic motivation; this effect takes place when a reward (introduction of an extrinsic reward ) is been attached as a motivator of behavior, as a result, decreases the intrinsic motivation (behavior that is driven by internal rewards) to do something. Incentive such as money, gift, praise etc are introduced after a behavior can lead to lower, rather than higher motivation to perform a task
According to the overjustification effect, reinforcements that praise people tend to increase intrinsic motivation, and reinforcement that seeks to control people decrease intrinsic motivation.
Answer:
b. Social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
Explanation:
Social consensus can be defined as a principle or theory which is used to distinguish between what is deemed good or bad in the behavior of the people living in a society.
On the other hand, the magnitude of consequences refers to the overall harm or benefit that is associated with an ethical decision chosen by an individual or group of people.
The difference between social consensus and magnitude of consequences is that social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
