Cavalier-Smith's model no longer separates prokaryotes and eukaryotes is the statement which differs from kingdom classification.
Explanation:
Cavalier-Smith in 1998 had reduced the kingdom numbers. The were brought down from 8 to 6. These are:
Animalia
Protozoa
fungi
plantae
chromista
bacteria
He divided eukaryotes into 6 kingdoms.  The kingdoms are refined for better classification.
While Carolus Linnaeus divided the organisms into two kingdoms 
Animalia and plantae.
The five kingdom classification:
Monera (prpkaryotes)
Protista  ( unicellular eukaryotes)
fungi (multicellular decomposers)
plantae (multicellular producers)
Animalia (multicellular consumers)
It has drawbacks like in kingdom monera both autotrophs and heterotrophs  are included. Phylogeny is not explained in lower organisms of monera and protista. Virus is also in classification. Cavalier-Smith introduced a new kingdom called chromista which are single- celled or multicellular eukaryotic organisms as diatoms, algae, oomycetes and protozoans which perform photosynthesis.
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
The correct answer is false and here is why:
Clear cutting refers to the cutting of trees, specifically all of the trees in one select area. Replanting is not done and this leads to deforestation.
Controlled burns have a completely different affect. They burn the under brush to help keep the soil rich with nutrients, plus they also help to prevent large crown fires that burn down whole forests from happening.
Clear cutting is a bad thing and controlled burns are a good limiter for a forest.
 
        
             
        
        
        
What attraction does the positive ab have with the negative ab?
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Hay infusion refers to an amalgamation that can be formed by taking samples from different sources like rivers, lakes, ponds, and others. It is one of the best procedures that can elevate the density of the bacteria cell at any specific time interval.  
In the given case, even after boiling hay infusion for one hour, growth was observed in the flask after one day. It can be due to certain factors like the hay infusion may have been comprising some endospore, which is resistant to heat or may comprise some kinds of bacteria that can withstand high temperatures.  
Because of which, even after heating the infusion for one hour, it did not get influenced by the heat and got the chance to grow when it got optimum temperature again at the time when the sample was left as such.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer: Scientific name: Felis catus.
Explanation: I hope this helps :p