The chauffeur killed Lord Hazelton
This case can be solved from the facts discovered by Detective Percule Hoirot. The first fact to keep in mind is that:
- Lord Hazelton was killed by a blow on the head with a brass candlestick.
From this, it can be inferred that fact C. is not true because he did not die from a fatal dose of strychnine. In addition, it can be concluded that at the time of the murder in cook was not in the kitchen.
If the cook was not in the kitchen at the time of the murder, that means Sara was not in the dining room at the time of the murder (fact E). So it can be concluded that it was Lady Hazelton who was in the dining room.
If Lady Hazelton was in the dining room at the time of the murder, the one who killed Lord Hazelton was the chauffeur (Fact D)
According to the above, the one who killed Lord Hazelton was the chauffeur.
Note: This question is incomplete because the question is missing. Here is the question.
- Who murdered Lord Hazelton?
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/4163827
Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Wealth, power and prestige are unequally distributed among people around the world. As a result, individuals in societies around the world can be easily grouped according to how much wealth, power and prestige that they possess.
Such grouping known as Global Stratification classifies individuals around the world according to their different lifestyle and life chances due to unequal distribution of wealth, power and prestige. Such classification draws attention to the inequalities between people in different countries of the world.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
please mark me brainliest
Answer:
the one that is closest to japan is Montana
Explanation:
Montana is only slightly larger than Japan:)
