Answer:
a) Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
b) 
c) 
d) 
e) For this case since the statistic is lower than the critical value and the p value higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis so then we don't have information to conclude that the true proportion is higher than 0.12
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
n=1000 represent the random sample selected
X=134 represent the number of young drivers ages 18 – 24 that had an accident
estimated proportion of young drivers ages 18 – 24 that had an accident
is the value that we want to verify
represent the significance level
Confidence=95% or 0.95
z would represent the statistic
![p_v{/tex} represent the p valuePart aWe want to verify if the population proportion of young drivers, ages 18 – 24, having accidents is greater than 12%: Null hypothesis:[tex]p\leq 0.12](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=p_v%7B%2Ftex%7D%20represent%20the%20p%20value%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EPart%20a%3C%2Fstrong%3E%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3EWe%20want%20to%20verify%20if%20the%20population%20proportion%20of%20young%20drivers%2C%20ages%2018%20%E2%80%93%2024%2C%20having%20accidents%20is%20greater%20than%2012%25%3A%20%20%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3ENull%20hypothesis%3A%5Btex%5Dp%5Cleq%200.12)
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic would be given by:
(1)
Part b
For this case since we are conducting a right tailed test we need to find a critical value in the normal standard distribution who accumulates 0.05 of the area in the right and we got:
Part c
For this case the statistic would be given by:
Part d
The p value can be calculated with the following probability:
Part e
For this case since the statistic is lower than the critical value and the p value higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis so then we don't have information to conclude that the true proportion is higher than 0.12
Answer:
(A) The rate of change in the price of a bushel of corn in the current year is $7.
(B) The price of a bushel of corn in the current year is $2 more than the price of a bushel of corn in the previous year.
Step-by-step explanation:
The graph for the prices of different numbers of bushels of corn at a store in the current year is shown below.
Part A:
The rate of change in the price of a bushel of corn in the current year based upon the number of bushels is known as the slope of the line.
The formula to compute the slope is:
Consider the ordered pairs: (4, 28) and (10, 70)
Compute the slope of the line as follows:
Thus, the rate of change in the price of a bushel of corn in the current year is $7.
Part B:
The data for the price of bushels in the previous year is as follows:
Number of Bushels Price
2 10
4 20
6 30
8 40
Compute the rate of change in the price of a bushel of corn in the previous year based upon the number of bushels as follows:
Consider the ordered pairs: (2, 10) and (6, 30)
The rate of change in the price of a bushel of corn in the previous year is $5.
Thus, the price of a bushel of corn in the current year is $2 more than the price of a bushel of corn in the previous year.
Answer:
12
Step-by-step explanation:
Distribute the negative which would get your 3x + 6 -3x + 6. The 3x would cancel out and you would add 6+6 = 12
Answer:
A. moving forward for 10m at a steady pace of 2m/s
B. moving backwards 8m at a steady pace of 2.67m/s
C. staying in the same spot for 4 seconds
D. moving 9m at a steady pace of 4.5m/s
E. moving 4.5m with an <u><em>average</em></u><em> </em>pace of 1.5m/s
Take 3 out of both of them
3(5x+2)
