Answer: Storage and retrieval
Explanation: In Keisha's case, as mentioned, she will remember for many years her friend's wedding night, so it's long-term memory, and that memory is arranged and stored as encoded in different parts of the brain, not in all parts, but not only one part of the brain. This means that a long-term stored memory encoded in this way can always be found and "recalled". There is another important fact in the question, that this is a really beautiful night of her friend's wedding. It should be said that all information is initially stored in short-term memory, and that important information is transferred over time to long-term memory. Since this is really important information / experience when it comes to Keisha, then surely all the information, that is, the experiences of the wedding will go into her long-term memory and she will remember the wedding for many years.
I'm confident in debates when I have facts, and good examples.
Answer: The child will engage himself in free exploration to the surrounding, and also be happy upon the caregiver's return
Explanation:
According to the theories of John Bowlby (1988), a child is securely-attached if she is confident of her caregiver’s support. The attachment figure serves as a "secure base" from which the child can confidently explore the world.
The securely-attached child explores the room freely when his mother is present. He may be distressed when his mother leaves, and he explores less when she is absent. But he is happy when she returns.
If he cries, he approaches his mother and holds her tightly. He is comforted by being held, and, once comforted, he is soon ready to resume his independent exploration of the world. His mother is responsive to his needs. As a result, he knows he can depend on her when he is under stress (Ainsworth et al 1978)
Secure attachment is also associated with
keeping track of the caregiver during exploration,approaching or touching the caregiver when anxious or distressed;finding comfort in proximity and contact
And, in the long-term, kids with secure attachments seem to have many advantages - emotional, social, medical, and cognitive.
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
